Army Lieutenant General Sung Wen (
Prosecutors and investigators claimed that Sung made false reports of public expenses through his subordinates for five years and illegally pocketed several million NT dollars. Hence, Taipei District Court judges granted a request by prosecutors to detain him on July 16.
In response to the case, Minister of Education Tu Cheng-sheng (杜正勝) said that it's difficult for a civilian education minister to supervise the department's administrative affairs. Only four of the department's 67 job items need the approval of the minister or deputy ministers. Moreover, the minister is only able to appoint three of the nation's more than 4,600 military-education instructors, while the department director is able to appoint all other instructors freely. The director's excessive power is thus evident.
It's certainly the police's responsibility to maintain social order and soldiers to safeguard the nation. But in Taiwan, thousands of career officers work at schools, not military agencies. This is an abnormal system.
Originally, the idea was proposed and passed to improve students' military skills during the first national education conference, held by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government soon after Japan's occupation of Jinan City in China's Shandong Province in 1928. However, after the KMT withdrew from China to Taiwan in 1949, it also introduced this militarism to Taiwan's schools, allowing military officers to work on campus. Although they are called military-education instructors, their original mission was to monitor the campus. Both these instructors and the so-called "second personnel offices" -- a KMT spy agency in governmental units and schools in the past -- tightly controlled the thoughts and actions of students and faculty.
Today, these instructors have transformed themselves, and they now have two missions in the nation's senior high and vocational schools, junior colleges, colleges and universities. First is teaching national defense courses (previously called military training courses). Second is providing counseling services to students. The latter includes drug and crime prevention work on campus, as well as teaching student safety both on and off campus.
For today's national defense education, schools should recruit talent with the professional knowledge to teach, rather than just instructors with officer's status. This will also justify the method of allowing students to reduce the length of their military service according to their class hours in military education. Take, for example, the useless military courses that I took in senior high school and college. My instructors merely chatted randomly with the students in class.
The situation remains unchanged. No wonder students often call such courses "nutritious credits," which means that they will get their credits for these meaningless courses no matter what. Such courses are merely offered to create job opportunities for Taiwan's officers.
Moreover, by offering student counseling services, the instructors take jobs away from graduates in college counseling departments. For student counseling, professional counselors can definitely do better than the instructors who graduated from some military schools.
Although the promotion channels for these instructors are quite narrow, they have relatively good pay increases. Apart from their monthly salaries paid by the Ministry of National Defense according to their military ranks, they receive subsidies from the education ministry for teaching courses or working overtime. Hence, many officers are attracted to such jobs. But this kind of system is a tumor in Taiwan's education circles, and has led to cases such as that of Sung. It's therefore about time to reform the system of military education instructors.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has advocated the withdrawal of such instructors from campus ever since it was an opposition party.
Now, the DPP is in the fifth year of its rule. As Sung's case was exposed, it is a good time for the party to carry out its policy. Hopefully, the education minister can carry out reforms, so that these instructors can also disappear from Taiwan's campuses after the cancellation of the "second personnel offices" a few years ago.
Li Hsin-fen is a lecturer at Chung Yuan Christian University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with