The Pentagon's Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China which was recently presented to Congress, noted that the possibility has been raised in some quarters that as a counter-threat against Chinese aggression, Taiwan could consider targeting densely populated cities or high-value infrastructure projects such as the Three Gorges Dam. Beijing responded violently to the suggestion, and according to a source close to the People's Liberation Army (PLA), quoted by the Straits Times of Singapore, the PLA countered that it not only had more than adequate resources to protect the Three Gorges Dam, but also that it had the capacity to target major dams in the US.
This shows the same attitude as Deputy Chief of the General Staff Xiong Guangkai's (雄光楷) statement in 1995, in which he threatened to launch nuclear missiles at Los Angeles if the US came to the defense of Taiwan. The Global Times, a newspaper under the umbrella of the People's Daily, has also quoted military sources as saying that if Taiwan launched a bombing raid against the Three Gorges Dam, the PLA would respond with sufficient force to "annihilate" Taiwan.
Even before this, a so-called military scholar, Xin Qi (辛旗), had spoken of "wiping out" Taiwan in a statement made in April 2000, a clear indication that China's vicious ambition to obliterate Taiwan predates and is not related to the suggestion of targeting the Three Gorges Dam.
The reason the Chinese leadership dares make continual military threats is that Taiwan is seen as unable to strike back. For this reason, they are willing to boast that they will pay any price in human lives or economic loss to achieve their goal of unification.
If Taiwan had medium-range missiles that could threaten the Zhongnanhai compound in Beijing or Yuquanshan, the headquarters of the Central Military Commission, threatening the lives of the warmongers without endangering innocent civilians, then they would not be so bold as to make their crazy threats.
The Chinese leadership is afraid of the US because it has missiles that have pinpoint accuracy and are able to penetrate underground bunkers. The Gulf War and the accidental 1999 bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade have taught former president Jiang Zemin (
China has also supplied weapons to Pakistan, including nuclear weapon technology, as a means of hemming in India, a country rather similar to China in some ways and a competitor in terms of economic and population growth. China even went to war with India in the early 1960s.
In January 2002, India successfully tested the Agni Ⅱ medium-range ballistic missile. It has a range of 2,500km, which could hit targets anywhere in Pakistan and in large areas of China. India is currently developing the Agni Ⅲ long-range ballistic missile, which would be able to target the densely populated cities of eastern and northeastern China. In January 2001, Vasudev Aatre, the scientific advisor to India's defense minister, pointed out that the new missile would be tested later that year. It was no secret that this missile was being developed as a deterrent to China.
The chairman of the Central Military Commission, Jiang Zemin (
Taiwan's nuclear development program was stopped by the US. Now that China's military capability is surging ahead, it is the responsibility of the US to protect Taiwan, not only through the sale of weapons, but also through support in such research and development. If Taiwan had missiles that could hit locations where China's leaders live, then the potential for conflict in the Taiwan Strait would be greatly reduced, and the chance of the US becoming embroiled in such a conflict would also be reduced.
Once Taiwan has acquired these missiles, it could make a statement rejecting their preemptive use, but retaining the right to use them in retaliation. This was the attitude China adopted when it began its nuclear program, After World War II, the military blocs of the East and West avoided nuclear devastation by creating a "balance of terror." In 1962, then president John Kennedy successfully resisted the threat of Soviet missile deployment in Cuba. The current cross-strait crisis also needs such mighty means and US boldness to achieve a resolution. Such a move would be the greatest possible memorial to all the late president Ronald Reagan sought to achieve.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY IAN BARTHOLOMEW
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with