French President Jacques Chirac played the political bad boy at this year's G8 summit by disrupting new trans-Atlantic harmony with a Gallic non to calls by his US hosts for a bigger NATO role in Iraq.
Chirac's comments made banner media headlines around the world on Thursday, stealing coverage of the G8 initiative aimed at promoting democracy and reform throughout the Middle East.
What a contrast to German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, who along with Chirac opposed the Iraq war but who deftly used the annual G8 summit at Georgia's luxury Sea Island resort to restore ties with the host, US President George W. Bush.
Asked by reporters about Chirac's reservations over NATO in Iraq, Schroeder took a strikingly different position.
"We will not block this," Schroeder said.
After the briefing, German officials scrambled to insist there was no real discord between Paris and Berlin.
"There are no differences between Germany and France over a deployment of NATO in Iraq," Schroeder said, according to a later statement by his chief spokesman Bela Anda.
Schroeder said it was not a question of NATO taking control in Iraq but rather of using the alliance to train Iraqi security forces as well as for other tasks.
This was confirmed by a senior US official who said that with or without NATO, there would not be large numbers of new troops going to Iraq, where US-led coalition forces now number more than 160,000.
NATO, 15 of whose 26 member states have troops serving in Iraq, is currently limited to providing logistical support to the Polish-run sector in Iraq.
On Wednesday, Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair called for an expanded NATO role in
Iraq but declined to give details
on exactly what they wanted. Concrete proposals were expected at NATO's Istanbul summit on June 28 and 29.
Chirac promptly rebuffed them.
"It does not fit with the vocation of NATO to intervene in Iraq," Chirac declared.
Contrasting with the Bush-Chirac differences, Schroeder and Bush used the relaxed summit atmosphere to forge a new working relationship.
Maybe it was the balmy weather, beach and palm trees that gave the final push to both leaders to bury the hatchet after their Iraq war feud.
As the two leaders met on the G8 sidelines, Bush's dog Barney also helped break the ice by taking a snooze between their feet.
Schroeder, who thrives in warmer regions, was delighted about the weather and swiftly followed Bush's advice over the dress code for the summit and shed his customary tie and jacket.
His attire contrasted with Chirac, who was the only leader stiffly dressed in full tie and jacket for the working sessions for the G8, which consists of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the US.
US officials were strongly upbeat after the private meeting between Bush and Schroeder on the G8 sidelines, saying the talks had been "very warm."
"We and the Germans have come back together," a senior official said.
Asked about the praise being heaped on him by Bush aides, Schroeder smiled and said, "It's nice that this is what's being talked about."
"We know we have to depend on each other and sometimes having disagreements is just a part of this," Schroeder said, adding that the key to good German-US ties was that both nations had a deep set of shared values.
"The [United States] is the only remaining superpower, and one must learn how to deal with that, and the last six months have shown that we can do this," Schroeder said.
Such a detente would have been unthinkable a year ago when the US and German leaders were locked in an angry row over Schroeder's use of his anti-Iraq war stance to win re-election in 2002.
US and German officials sunk into a tit-for-tat cycle of insults that reached a low point when a Schroeder Cabinet member compared Bush to Adolf Hitler.
The minister resigned, but the damage was done, and US officials described German-US ties as "poisoned." Bush broke off contact with Schroeder, and the two leaders did not talk for almost 12 months.
But that's all over now, stressed the US official: "Last year ... belongs to the category of history."
In a further Schroeder-Chirac contrast, Schroeder underlined the importance of attending yesterday's funeral in Washington
of former US president Ronald Reagan.
"I want to pay my respects to a president who did a great deal for German unification," Schroeder said.
Chirac has declined to attend and became testy when asked
why he was not going by French reporters.
Schroeder admitted that 25 years ago, while leading the youth wing of his Social Democratic Party, he had often disagreed with Reagan.
But then he paused and added that some of the positions he
had held as a younger man had changed.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with