Democrats know what "vitiate" means.
"In this world, two people can be deeply in love and ... they should be permitted to be married," US Congressman Dennis Kucinich said in a debate for the presidential nomination early this year. "To say that you've got to go from state to state to achieve that right absolutely vitiates who we are as a nation."
A year ago, General Wesley Clark, soon to be a Democratic candidate, warned that if there were continued US casualties and demonstrations in Iraq, "it will vitiate the impact of the very successful military operations we just concluded there."
The year before that, according to Bob Woodward's revealing Plan of Attack, a meeting was held in the White House that included President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and legislative aide Nicholas Calio. The subject was the "homeland security" bill that Bush was pressing for; the sweeping proposal was meeting resistance from Democratic lawmakers. The word "security" had been substituted for "defense" at the request of the Defense Department.
"The Homeland Security bill was being blocked in the Senate by a filibuster," wrote Woodward. "Calio told the president that they were about to `vitiate' the filibuster." The author then quoted the president asking Calio the meaning of the word. "Cheney, too, wondered aloud what vitiate meant."
Apparently the aide did not have a definition on the tip of his tongue, but "The next day Calio brought in a two-page handout of definitions from the Webster's and American Heritage dictionaries describing that vitiate meant to void or render ineffective. Later the White House did exactly that, securing the 60 votes needed to end debate and passing the bill."
"Webster's" is a name used by many dictionaries, but the best seller is Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Diction-ary, the eleventh edition of which is a direct descendant of the work first published by Noah Webster in 1806. It notes the Latin root vitium means fault or vice, and defines it first as "to make faulty or defective" with a quotation from William Styron: "The comic impact is vitiated by obvious haste."
The Webster's New World College Dictionary leads its definition with "to make imperfect, faulty, or impure; spoil; corrupt." My unabridged and more expensive favorite dictionary, American Heritage, also consulted by Calio, agrees. It has a nice array of synonyms at corrupt, an entry I frequently consult when wearing my scandalmonger's cap ("debase, debauch, deprave, pervert, vitiate" -- so many stories to tell, so little space).
Woodward's account featured a problematic phrase: "They were about to `vitiate' the filibuster." I'm aware of many of the debaucheries and perversions prevalent in the nation's capital, and have even energized debase, but I never heard such depravity applied to a filibuster.
A call to Senate historian Richard A. Baker elicited this response: "I don't think that's common usage applied to a filibuster. I've heard `vitiate the order,' meaning `to set aside or strike out the order to do such-and-such,' as in `Mr. President, I move that we vitiate the order.' That's commonly heard on the floors of the House and Senate. And you can vitiate a cloture motion, which is designed to cut off a filibuster, rendering it moot. I'll fax one over."
Since Calio was the author's main source for this account (Bush urged his appointees to cooperate with Woodward), my researcher tracked him down at his new office, where he runs government relations for banking's giant Citigroup. How do you vitiate a filibuster?
"Woodward's book is a little bit off on this," he said. "What I told the president and vice president was that they were going to vitiate cloture, not vitiate the filibuster." Once filed, a cloture motion -- cutting off a filibuster, something senators hate to do -- must be voted on within two days unless all senators agree to vitiate, or yank, the motion. By threatening cloture, senators put their filibustering colleague's feet to the fire; that's when compromises are struck, following which everybody shakes hands and somebody moves to vitiate cloture.
"If ineffectuate is a word," Calio said, "I think vitiate in this sense means ineffectuate." We are all now prepared to serve in the US Senate.
Just one more thing. In his account of this stupefyingly boring episode, Woodward -- who was obviously not present in the room -- quotes the president directly asking Calio what the word meant. Woodward quotes Bush as using a familiar expletive not in its literal verb sense, but in a slangy nominative that, when broadcast, causes great official concern at the Federal Communications Commission.
To my knowledge, nobody has called attention to this somewhat startling report, perhaps because Page 186 is so dull that the usual sharp eyes have glazed over.
The direct quotation of Bush's question about vitiate, which the reader will note I have not repeated in recounting the episode, is one of the rare times anyone has attributed that usage to any president.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with