She may wince now with pain from shaking the hands of so many voters, but South Korean opposition party leader Park Geun-hye could yet emerge from next week's parliamentary election with a smile.
Political analysts say her conservative Grand National Party will certainly no longer dominate the single-chamber National Assembly, where it held more than half the seats and often thwarted Korean President Roh Moo-hyun's reform plans.
But it could win significantly more seats than many thought after the party voted to impeach Roh on March 12 and bombed in the opinion polls for misjudging the public mood.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Anything short of a rout for a party tainted by corruption scandals would be success in the turbulent world of South Korean politics -- a world in which the left-leaning, pro-Roh Uri Party surged from being just a splinter group to a position where it could secure a big majority in the new 299-seat parliament.
"Maybe a few weeks ago we were talking about a devastating defeat for the Grand National Party. But now no longer," said political commentator Shim Jae-hoon, who saw the opposition party winning about 100 seats.
"Passions are cooling, the impeachment bubble is bursting and people are recovering a sense of stability."
Other political analysts said the Grand National Party was likely to secure between 80 and 120 seats -- more than the opinion polls suggested in the run-up to the campaign.
Shim and other political analysts said that did not mean the Grand National Party's future was assured in a transitional period in which the divide is increasingly between generations rather than the regions that have for so long played the decisive role in parliamentary and presidential elections.
"Park is making efforts to reform the Grand National Party, but it will take time to judge whether the efforts are successful," said Kim Il-young, a political scientist at Seoul's Sungkyunkwan University.
Park, whose father Park Chung-hee ruled South Korea from a 1961 coup until he was gunned down by his own intelligence chief in 1979, said this week the most urgent task was to apologize to the people and change the party's negative image.
"To be reborn as a clean and policy-focused party is the only way to recover the people's trust," she said.
The analysts said the gestation period may prove long.
"Although the Roh government made lots of mistakes, the Grand National Party also lost its moral ground," said Kim Kwang-dong, a political scientist at Seoul's Korea University.
He said the scandal concerning illegal political funding, which has hit most parties but hurt the Grand National Party the most, had undermined the party's position. Shim agreed.
"The Grand National Party has had a number of problems, one of which is that it is too deeply tainted with corruption," he said. "In fact, the amount of illegal campaign funding that it shook down from the business community went up to something like $70 billion won (US$60 million), which was unprecedentedly high."
Shim said the Grand National Party had failed to move swiftly to address a growing generation gap. Roh was elected by young voters who now back the Uri Party, have less hardline views on North Korea and are less wedded to unfettered market economics.
"Everywhere you see the new-generation voters are challenging the old accepted norms," he said.
Nam Y. Lee of Sookmyung Women's University in Seoul said it was far from clear the Grand National Party was re-inventing itself and that the effect of Park Geun-hye's March 23 election as leader on the party's standing was probably limited.
"There were already people who opposed an Uri Party landslide and want to check its complete seizure of power," he said.
"In this sense, Park Geun-hye merely offered them a reason to support the Grand National Party."
Opinion polls are banned in the last two weeks of the campaign, so the effect of recent events such as security scares in Iraq and economic data is difficult to judge.
Uri Party leader Chung Dong-young got off to a bad start last week when he had to join the line of contrite leaders for telling old people to stay at home and let the young decide the future.
Most analysts say the comment is unlikely to play hugely in the Grand National Party's favor because of the generation split but could dissuade some young people with traditional Confucian values that honor the elderly from voting for the Uri Party.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with