Reached on his picture-taking mobile phone in Purgatory, where he is halfway through expiating his price-control sin, Richard Nixon -- winner of innumerable primary elections -- agreed to a brief interview with his former speechwriter.
Q: What's your reading of the results of yesterday's round of primaries?
RN: Southern charm sells in South Carolina. I like this Edwards; he's a helluva salesman of the old Truman "special interests" line. And his victory speech was straight out of Jesse Jackson's convention rouser. Edwards was willing to roll the dice, too, saying he had to win that first Southern primary or he was finished. Gutsy.
Q: But doesn't he seem a little young to run for president?
RN: He's 50, three years older than I was when I ran against Kennedy in 1960.
Q: What's his vulnerability?
RN: Slick lawyer. Beat US$25 million for himself out of doctors and hospitals in malpractice suits, and that money came out of average families' pockets in the form of higher insurance premiums. That, plus the trial lawyers' lobby, bought and paid for him on tort reform. Some oppo research could rough him up a bit, but not enough to kill his chances.
Q: Not inexperience?
RN: I'd hate to see him in a room with Putin, and Chirac would eat him for lunch. But even if Edwards doesn't make it, he's a slam-dunk for running mate. And if the Democratic ticket loses, all the exposure -- and the national experience -- would make him a natural to take on Hillary for the top spot next time. He's a comer.
Q: You're certain, then, that Kerry has the nomination sewed up?
RN: He got up off the floor and made a good comeback, and I like the comeback story, as you know. And last night, Kerry won big in Missouri, where the delegates are. Picking up delegates is like washing dishes by hand -- one by one, state by state till you have the magic number and the nomination. Then the hell with 'em.
Q: How did Kerry manage to turn it around?
RN: You want me to say "electability" like all those jackasses yakkin' it up on cable. That's what Rockefeller tried on me, but only the hacks and the hot partisans put electability first. It's one element, but it can get loused up in fluctuating mano-a-mano polls, and it vanishes as an asset when the election campaign begins. No, Kerry came back because he's an homme serioux -- that's French for a man with gravitas -- which is what people want, and it doesn't matter that he has a face like a horse.
Q: What happened to Howard Dean?
RN: Dean fell in love with his early press clips and the clapping of the antiwar bunch, but he couldn't take the heat and blew it. I feel for him in a way -- all those pretty-face media types kissing your ring when you're flying high, and then the minute you stumble, they smell blood and turn on you like a wolf pack. But put my media feeling on deep background -- it's something I'm supposed to be expiating.
Q: After losing everywhere last night, can Dean come back?
RN: If he could get Kerry to debate one on one, sure. But Kerry's no dope. Never debate when you're ahead.
Q: Who would win in a televised Kerry-Bush debate?
RN: Kerry on debating points, but Bush on personality, optimism and all that stuff that Kennedy and Reagan had down pat. But Edwards would lose to Cheney -- against a steady hand, there's such a thing as too much charisma.
Q: Will the dominant issue in the campaign be jobs or Iraq or health care?
RN: You forget the Kinmen-Matsu syndrome. What decides a close race is how candidates react to an October surprise. What if bin Laden is caught, or "Dr. Germs" spills the beans about Iraqi anthrax, or our casualties continue? What about a White House scandal, or some revelation about a candidate's liberalism, or a heart attack? What if the market falls out of bed or there's a terrorist attack or the Chinese move on Kinmen and Matsu?
Q: Yes -- what if?
RN: Most crises help incumbents.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with