Former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) insist on the Republic of China (ROC) and make public their determination to safeguard the current Constitution because without it there would be no ROC. As outlined in the Constitution, no change to the territory is allowed. That's why the pan-blue camp has made all-out efforts to oppose the special-state-to-state theory and the one-country-on-each-side theme.
PFP Chairman James Soong (
On top of the relationship between China and Taiwan, we may indeed have two countries inside Taiwan, as Soong pointed out, but they consist of one side representing "one China" and the other side supporting Taiwan. And the "one China" faction in Taiwan does not sing the same tune as the "one China" faction on the other side of the Strait.
While accompanying Chen in Manhattan, American Institute in Taiwan Chairwoman Therese Shaheen publicly said that US President George W. Bush was Chen's "secret angel." Her comment showed that the US stood firm behind Chen, which can be equated with its firm support for Taiwan.
We can understand why her comment irritated China, yet to our bewilderment, it has also irritated the pan-blue camp. Pan-blue lawmakers publicly listed Shaheen as persona non grata. At the same time, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Liu Jianchao (
Why has Taiwan-friendly Shaheen become the common enemy of Chinese communists and the pan-blue camp? If we examine their relationship in light of German political philosopher Carl Schmitt's "friend-foe distinction," the issue of who is the friend and who the enemy becomes very clear and interesting.
Shaheen's is not an isolated case. During his US stopover, Chen publicly talked about referendums and a new constitution, and the US still gave him an unprecedented warm welcome.
This made the pan-blue camp realize that their criticism of Chen had not worked at all.
They also came to the painful conclusion that the US had on the one hand allowed the KMT-PFP alliance to prevent Chen from enacting a new constitution and declaring Taiwan's independence, while on the other hand permitting Shaheen to side with Chen. They just felt they had been cheated by the US.
Coincidentally, China also felt cheated. Beijing felt cheated because Chen was treated so well in the US. Therefore, Chen's breakthrough during his visit in the US was a major setback for both the pan-blue camp and China. Both of them suffered from being cheated by Washington.
From this, isn't it obvious who is siding with whom in the one-country-on-each-side discourse? Who is whose enemy cannot be more obvious than this.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with