As next year's presidential election draws near, the gap between support ratings for President Chen Shui-bian (
While the president was visiting the US and Panama, the KMT legislative caucus on Nov. 4 condemned his visit to China in 1991 when he was a legislator, questioning whether he saw any Chinese leaders, made any promises or colluded with the Chinese communists to sell out Taiwan. Some even said he should be ashamed for taking a photo with a Chinese tank at a military museum in Beijing, and that he was much inferior to the man who tried to stop a long line of tanks during the notorious 1989 Tiananmen Square Incident.
In fact, the KMT legislative caucus' campaign trick was an ignorant method that exposed its own weakness by contrasting Chen's, Lien's and Soong's personal experiences in dealing with China. Chen did visit China during his term as a legislator. During his trip, he met Tang Shubei (
Given the cross-strait political environment at that time, it was indeed a breakthrough for Chen -- a pro-Taiwan independence legislator from Taiwan's biggest opposition party -- to visit China. Not only did he let the officials for Taiwan affairs understand the nation's political development and the voice of the Taiwanese people, he also gained a better understanding of Beijing's political hegemony and its negotiation mode.
Thanks to such past experience, Chen has always made the development of cross-strait relations, national defense, military research and Taiwan's future status his main focus throughout his political career. As a result, he proposed the "four ifs," "de facto sovereignty," the referendum platform and the Resolution on Taiwan's Future one after another inside the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). This laid a foundation for his dominance of the DPP's China policy.
Besides, he advanced with the times by proposing various cross-strait policies -- such as a basic cross-strait treaty, the "five noes," the cross-strait integration dictum, the relaxation of the "no haste, be patient" policy and the policy of "active opening, effective management." He also proposed to push for a new constitution through a referendum not long ago. These proposals allow Taiwan to rationally and practically face China's threat of swallowing up the nation and building Taiwan into a new democratic and free society and country.
This shows that Chen knows Beijing much better than Lien or Soong. His valuable visit to China made him understand how to handle complicated cross-strait issues, as well as how to deal with Chinese leaders appropriately. This is where Lien and Soong are inferior to Chen. Today, the KMT has tried to attack Chen using his own campaign tactic of calling rivals "pro-China," and using his past visit to smear him. In fact, this action only further exposed their ignorant and absurd attitude. How can the Taiwanese people trust them for correctly handling cross-strait affairs?
The KMT legislative caucus' mistaken campaign strategy will not make the Taiwanese people believe that Chen was selling out Taiwan during his visit to China. On the contrary, it will make us think that this is a reflection of the Lien-Soong camp's lack of confidence -- as the Chinese saying goes, "There is no 300 taels of silver buried here" (
As a legislative assistant at that time, I was fortunate to visit China with Chen in 1991. I still remember that he wrote down "Taiwan" in the column of nationality on the customs form when entering China through the Beijing International Airport. At first, those Chinese customs officials did not know whether they should request him to correct "Taiwan" to "China" or directly prohibit his entry. But he was allowed to enter China eventually thanks to the Chinese government's courteous reception.
Chen was neither too humble nor haughty in his dealings with China. He demonstrated the determination of the Taiwanese people and maintained our dignity. Saying that Chen was selling out Taiwan during his visit to China is perhaps the biggest joke of all.
Chen Sung-shan is a member of the Cabinet's Civil Service Protection and Training Commission.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with