President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) exchanged greetings and shook hands twice with US Sec-retary of State Colin Powell as he attended the state banquet arranged by Panamanian President Mireya Moskoso. This Chen-Powell meeting was made possible thanks to the Panamanian government's meticulous arrangements. This is the most rewarding part of Chen's trip to Panama.
Although Taiwan and Panama have maintained relatively stable relations, rumors of discord have surfaced every now and again.
Taiwan is at a disadvantage competing with China in Panama. In terms of economic statistics, China enjoys a far closer relationship with Panama than does Taiwan. China-Panama bilateral trade in 2001 reached US$1.241 billion, while the trade volume between Taiwan and Panama that same year was US$120 million.
China is the third-biggest user of the Panama Canal. Hutchison Whampoa, which operates the ports of Cristobal and Balboa at each end of the Panama Canal, enjoys close ties with China. The business fees the company pays annually are very important for the Panamanian government. Under these circumstances, Taiwanese diplomats have been under great pressure, especially after 1996 when China and Panama set up trade representative offices.
There was a breakthrough in August, however, when Taiwan and Panama signed a free-trade agreement (FTA), an important indicator of bilateral relations.
Every country has political and economic considerations when signing FTAs. Taiwan gave a great preferential deal to Panama's agricultural produce and even promised to offer an annual duty-free import quota of 5,000 tonnes of sugar. Panama could even make Taiwan its springboard to enter the Asian market.
For the Taiwanese govern-ment, however, the import value from Panama only totals US$4.8 million, accounting for a small proportion in the nation's foreign trade. Therefore, after the FTA takes effect, its impact on the Taiwanese market will be limited.
But this FTA won't just benefit Panama. The Taiwanese government also benefits from expanding businesses into American countries. Moreover, Taiwanese businesspeople investing in Panama enjoy the same treatment extended to Panamanian nationals. Panama also promised to open up its finance, land transportation, tourism, logistics and value-added telecommunications service industries.
In general, the FTA covers three main areas: trade liberalization, expedition and economic cooperation. If these can be implemented step by step, Taiwan-Panama relations will gradually develop into a more refined network. Our efforts made Panama's first Vice President Arturo Vallarino call off a trip to Beijing on Aug. 30 at the last minute. This symbolizes the fruit we have harvested from the long-term cultivation of diplomatic relations with Panama.
Chen's transit stop in the US en route to Panama implies a possibility that we can make use of the US factor. Although the US has formally returned the Panama Canal to Panama, the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 stipulates that the US shall have primary responsibility to protect and defend the canal when facing any armed attack or other actions that threaten the security of the canal or of ships passing through it. It suggests the intervention of the US anytime in the name of security. Apart from that, Panama's deep dependence on US trade and investment has forced the country to heed the US' stance.
In the future, Taiwan should closely integrate its diplomatic efforts in the US with those in Panama and other Central American countries so as to bring its overall strength into full play.
Teng Chung-chian is a visiting scholar at the Sigur Center for Asian Studies at George Washington University and a professor of diplomacy at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with