The solidarity among African leaders that has sustained President Robert Mugabe's brutal regime in Zimbabwe may be on the verge of disintegrating. Mugabe's decision to shut down Zimbabwe's only independent newspaper, The Daily News, could prove to be crucial in weakening the support that he still enjoys in the region.
Three years ago a truck packed with explosives careened into the building housing the newspaper. Its printing press was destroyed. With the assistance of foreign donors, however, The Daily News acquired a new press and managed to keep publishing a first-rate newspaper.
Despite government attempts since then to shut the paper down -- arresting and even torturing some of its staff, as well as tampering with its circulation and newsprint supply -- The Daily News adhered to its slogan of "telling it like it is." As Zimbabwe plunged into economic chaos and Mugabe stepped up his repression, circulation, once around 100,000 a day, fell by roughly a third.
Last month, Mugabe's riot police, armed with AK-47 rifles, raided the paper, halting production and looting much of its equipment -- though not the new printing press, which was too big to carry away.
The purported reason for closing The Daily News is that the paper refused to register under the bizarrely named Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA) of 2002 on the grounds that it violates Zimbabwe's constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression.
Under the AIPPA, reporters are required to file their home addresses with the government; presumably this is what the word "privacy" in the law's title means. Reporters may face criminal prosecution for publishing inaccurate information; apparently, this is the basis for the reference to "access to information."
At least a dozen journalists have been arrested under the AIPPA, including the only foreign correspondent permanently based in the country, Andrew Meldrum of the British newspaper The Guardian. Meldrum was subsequently deported.
The Mugabe regime has committed outrage after outrage. Its catalogue of crimes includes: stealing last year's elections that enabled Mugabe to hold on to power; torturing and murdering supporters of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change; transformation of a fertile, prosperous country once considered Africa's breadbasket into a place where half the population barely survives on foreign food handouts; and, as exemplified by its attacks on The Daily News, the suppression of critical voices.
Yet Zimbabwe's neighbors, particularly those in Southern Africa, have defended Mugabe.
In late August, the heads of state of 13 members of the Southern African Development Community (SADC), including Mugabe and South African President Thabo Mbeki, met in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, to consider the challenges before them.
Among the 54 paragraphs of the summit's final communique, two dealt with Zimbabwe. One proclaimed "solidarity with Zimbabwe ... to encourage and sustain the positive developments that are taking place." The other condemns "the Commonwealth, the EU, and the US sanctions as they hurt not only ordinary Zimbabweans but also have profound social and economic implications on the region as a whole."
The suggestion that international sanctions are a cause of Zimbabwe's economic woes is ludicrous, as the measures that have been imposed have nothing to do with trade. Indeed, it is the governments cited in the communique that are donating the food that keeps Zimbabweans alive. The targeted sanctions address such matters as the foreign bank accounts of Mugabe and his associates and their right to travel to Europe and the US on holidays and shopping trips.
Yet the closing of The Daily News seems to have prompted the first signs that things may be changing. Nigeria's President Olusegun Obasanjo responded to the paper's closure with the announcement that Mugabe would not be invited to the December meeting of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting scheduled to take place in his capital, Abuja.
Mbeki reacted to Obasanjo's announcement with what South Africa's business weekly The Financial Mail described as "surprise and consternation."
Much depends on whether Africa follows the path now being charted by Obasanjo or whether the continent's leaders stick to the line of the SADC and Mbeki. It is not only the future of Zimbabwe that is at stake. Also at issue is whether the rest of the world takes seriously the commitments to democracy and good governance in the New Economic Partnership for Africa Development (NEPAD) and the Constitutive Act for the new African Union.
Mbeki and Obasanjo took the lead in making these commitments. Zimbabwe tests whether they will deliver.
Aryeh Neier, the president of the Open Society Institute and a founder of Human Rights Watch, is the author of Taking Liberties: Four Decades in the Struggle for Rights. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with