Taiwan's ruling and opposition parties are rare phemonena in the world of political parties. More than three years after the transfer of political power, the ruling and opposition parties continue to play reversed roles. The ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) behaves like an opposition party in its election campaigning, going on the offensive and regularly floating controversial issues. In contrast, the pan-blue alliance, made up of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP), behaves like it is in government: loaded with heavy political baggage, and slow in reacting to political developments, public opinion and other trends.
A massive, 200,000-strong demonstration was held in Kaohsiung City on Saturday to demand referendums and a new constitution. In a speech to demonstrators that evening, President Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwan's political spectrum is changing. KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Chen is resorting to the brinkmanship game in his campaign strategy. Although the DPP still lags in the polls, the gap between the blue and green camps is bound to fall to under five percent in the latter stage of the campaign, given that the DPP has the advantage of incumbency and is adopting more flexible strategies to eat away at their rivals' support base.
All media polls indicate that the Chen-Lu ticket, with Vice President Annette Lu (
Chen is also adopting brinkmanship in dealing with China. If Beijing reacts too strongly to Chen's appeal for referendums and a new constitution, this will result in public anger. China will then have repeated the self-defeating interference it indulged in during Taiwan's presidential races in 1996 and 2000. Chen stands to benefit from such an outcome. If Beijing responds moderately or makes no response at all, Chen will still benefit.
The US is aware of the game being played in Taiwan, but Chen must be careful not to irritate Washington by being too provocative. But by sending officials to Washington to explain the government's position and arranging transit stops in the US as part of Chen's diplomatic tour, Taiwan has managed to stay on track in its relations with the US and China.
The brinkmanship strategy is a double-edged sword. Gripping this sword, Chen can score points quickly if he makes the right moves. But one false move could also get him into big trouble.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with