On Wednesday, former president Lee Teng-hui (
secretary-general.
Lee's appearance was notable for a number of reasons. It was the first time that a former president had been summoned to give testimony. Lee's wife, Tseng Wen-hui (
Taiwan's democracy has therefore matured to the point where even a former president and former first lady are held to be no different from any other citizen when seeking judicial redress and testifying when required. Some have suggested that it is a personal insult to Lee to summon him in such a manner. This view is thoroughly outdated. Even former US president Bill Clinton had to testify before a grand jury on his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. So, former presidents and serving presidents -- to the extent that presidential duties are not obstructed -- have obligations before the courts as other citizens do.
On the other hand, the responses of the KMT and PFP to Lee's summons have been far from satisfactory. Regardless of what the judiciary and the prosecutors' office will do or have done in relation to this case, the Chung Hsing Bills Finance scandal continues to leave a very big question mark hanging over Soong's character. Were Soong not to run in next year's presidential election, it would suffice to leave the matter in the hands of the judiciary. However, since Soong is still in the race, he and his party ought to realize that the real judge and jury for this case are the voters. Soong must offer the public a satisfactory explanation of his conduct. He would do well not to evade the issue, in the hope that voters will, on the assumption that all politicians are corrupt across the board, let bygones be bygones.
As argued by Chuang Po-lin (
It is absurd to hear the pan-blue camp wailing "political oppression" over the decision of the prosecutors' office to open a new investigation into the matter. The KMT is of course put in a most awkward position, since it is supposedly the real victim here. Yet it had been quick to come to Soong's defense. The same level of enthsusiasm could not be detected in KMT corridors when Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
If the KMT had been cunning, then the least it could have done was remain quiet this time around, and not reinforce the impression that political interests top their agenda over matters of propriety. Such impressions matter to a significant number of middle-of-the-road voters.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with