Taiwan has changed dramatically since the lifting of martial law and the nation's accompanying democratization.
So, too, has Taiwan's foreign policy. The changes associated with democratization, and their consequences, raise important questions concerning the making of Taiwan's foreign policy. How will foreign policy be made? What will be the role of the president, the bureaucracy, the legislature and non-governmental actors?
When discussing the making of foreign policy in Washington, a political scientist once observed that "the pieces of the foreign policy package are scattered all over town."
This observation applies with special force to foreign policy decision making in Taipei. Numerous governmental institutions now play a role in shaping foreign policy. Perhaps most intriguing, however, is President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) advancement of "people's diplomacy" or "people-to-people-diplomacy."
The Chen administration contends that creative means of diplomacy must be pursued if Taiwan is to successfully circumvent the growing economic, political and military power of China.
By employing a variety of unconventional diplomatic tactics that fall under the broad rubric of "people-to-people diplomacy," Taipei is seeking, with some degree of success, to boost its international profile and improve relations with foreign nations. These tactics include the use of inter-parliamentary diplomacy, party-to-party diplomacy and non-governmental organization (NGO) diplomacy.
Inter-parliamentary diplomacy calls for Taiwan's lawmakers to become involved in international affairs and develop relationships with legislators in other democracies. And it has contributed to a string of small victories for Taipei.
For example, the US Congress has passed a series of pro-Taiwan resolutions and laws, including a demand that the Bush administration treat Taiwan as a non-NATO ally.
Taiwanese lawmakers also played an important role in convincing American lawmakers to establish a new bi-partisan, pro-Taiwan association in the US Congress -- the Taiwan Caucus.
The European Parliament, the only popularly elected legislative body that represents all the citizens of the EU's 15 member states, has passed a variety of pro-Taiwan resolutions. These range from demands that China remove the roughly 350 missiles it has deployed directly opposite Taiwan to pleas for the international community to support Taiwan's bid for membership in the WHO.
Party-to-party diplomacy involves Taiwanese political parties establishing friendly ties with their foreign counterparts and joining inter-party organizations.
Taiwan does enjoy deep support among a wide range of foreign political parties -- particularly America's political parties. But even minor Taiwanese parties have discovered that their counterparts overseas will support the country if threatened by China.
For example, when the PRC conducted a series of provocative "missile tests" off Taiwan's coastline in 1996, Taiwan's Green Party appealed to the European Federation of Green Parties for support.
Finally, the Chen administration has seized upon the idea of increased NGO participation as a means by which the public can help raise Taiwan's international profile and ultimately help the government achieve its diplomatic goals.
NGOs are viewed as a vital part of the drive to use more unconventional diplomatic tactics to achieve foreign policy goals.
As Taiwan's foreign minister, observed, it is "crucial for all the people of Taiwan to engage in diplomatic work."
It is believed that many of Taiwan's NGOs are actively engaged in such activities.
For example, in January 2001, the Taiwan International Medical Alliance was established by a group of medical professionals. The organization has one key objective: to help Taipei achieve its long-standing goal of becoming a member of the WHO. The Taiwanese now participate in over 1,000 NGOs.
A vast majority of the Taiwanese population support recent moves to employ people-to-people diplomacy and other unconventional tactics to achieve the nation's foreign policy goals.
As one Taiwanese lawmaker quipped, most agree with the old adage that "diplomacy is too important to be left to the diplomats."
Obviously, people-to-people diplomacy is not the only factor or perhaps even a critical determinant when one seeks to explain how Taiwan manages successfully to circumvent a powerful foe determined to isolate it internationally and engineer its demise as a sovereign state.
However, Taiwan's novel approach to international relations is certainly a contributing factor and one that merits further study and investigation.
Dennis Hickey is professor of Political Science and University Fellow in Research at Southwest Missouri State University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with