We had numerous reflections and reviews after the 921 earthquake. A Public Television Service special program also brought up possible "motorcycle fires" around buildings after an earthquake, even though such fires did not actually occur in the 921 earthquake. Although the recent blaze in Luchou, Taipei County, was not caused by an earthquake, the danger of such a motorcycle fire is not so different from an earthquake fire.
Since deadly motorcycle fires have caused casualties in Taiwan, I have started a series of experiments supported by the National Science Council (NSC) since 1997. From my research, I understand that the core of the problem lies in most existing legally built structures' lack of resistance against possible scooter fires.
Motorcycle fires may seriously damage both buildings and their users. But related regulations are lacking in the laws of the advanced countries. As a result, Taiwan does not have related regulations either, because its fire regulations on urban planning, architectural technologies, and fire control were in fact largely copied from those countries. For example, when designing motorcycle parking spaces, the danger of fires spreading to surrounding buildings has never been taken into account.
In terms of architectural design, we failed to require buildings close to motorcycle parking spaces to use fireproof materials on the exterior. In terms of those "half-outdoor" parking spaces for motorcycles -- such as overhangs and hallways -- our regulations fail to require the installation of fire-control equipment.
Theoretically, a building's fire-safety design is an integration of urban planning, architectural facilities and fire-control equipment. The principles for the three's design and installation should be based on one another's fire-safety functions. Unfortunately, as the requirement of motorcycle-fire prevention is completely lacking in the three aspects at the moment, our buildings are incapable of resisting such unique motorcycle fires.
What's more frightening is that Taiwan has about 10 million motorcycles -- almost one for every two people. These vehicles are usually located around houses, businesses and office buildings. Most motorcycles are made of flammable plastics. Once a fire breaks out when several motorcycles are parked together, the flames may spread up to the second or third floor.
Today, large amounts of flammable materials are arbitrarily placed around buildings. Since most buildings are capable of resisting neither accidental fires nor arson, residents of these buildings face greater threats once a motorcycle fire occurs.
No regulations were stipulated in Taiwan's laws in the past because no precedent could be borrowed from the world's advanced countries. Moreover, immediate establishment of new fire-prevention measures may only be applied to newly constructed buildings. It will be a time- and money-consuming project even if we request the existing legally built structures that are considered "potentially dangerous" improve both their structures and materials, and to increase fire-safety equipment at motorcycle parking areas.
Immediately feasible and effective measures are perhaps the strategies applied to building use and management. These strategies can reach their maximum effectiveness if they are made by residents themselves. For example, at the residential complex where I live, the self-made regulation that the space before building entrances has to be cleared within a certain range serves as an example.
Lin Ching-yuan is the chairman of the department of architecture at the National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with