Deadly attacks on US forces in Iraq have so far been the work of disparate insurgents, but anger at the US-led occupation could spark broader resistance.
"It's not yet a guerrilla war," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).
"There is no central control, it's not a unified movement and the attacks are concentrated in the western part of Iraq," he said.
This partly chimes with the views of General Richard Myers, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, who said at the weekend that resistance was fragmented and restricted to a Sunni Muslim triangle from Baghdad to the north and west.
He identified five groups behind assaults that have killed 29 US soldiers since President George W. Bush declared major combat over on May 1, three weeks after former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's fall.
These were Saddam loyalists, foreign fighters from Syria and Iran, the Ansar al-Islam group said to be linked to al-Qaeda, criminals freed by Saddam before the war and Sunni extremists.
Analysts agreed the resistance was fractured, but said US officials, at least in public, were understating the growing resentment of many Iraqis at the unsubtle tactics of American troops grappling to impose control in a postwar power vacuum.
"I see this as Somalia writ large," said Jonathan Stevenson, an American counter-terrorism expert at London's International Institute for Strategic Studies.
"So far atomized groups are becoming increasingly hostile to the American occupation," he said.
Much more is at stake for the US in Iraq than in Somalia, where a US relief mission ended in disaster in 1993 after 18 US troops were killed in a firefight with militiamen.
Stevenson said the Americans were meeting a "creeping but rather strong nationalism" in Iraq, where they were failing to deliver on perceived promises to improve living conditions and hand the country back to Iraqis after 35 years of Baathist rule.
Musclebound occupation
US firepower could suppress any direct military challenge from what he described as a nascent insurgency, but this would not produce the stability the Americans sought.
"They need a political solution that vindicates the war and wins the peace. They're still groping for how to do that," he said.
Stevenson said there was no solid indication yet that al-Qaeda or other "transnational terrorists" were meddling in Iraq, but argued that the US presence there was a tempting target.
"Even if they haven't yet penetrated Iraq, they would like to do so and hook up with indigenous Islamists there," he said.
US administrator Paul Bremer has said patience is needed to rebuild a shattered country, but time is not on his side.
"If the political failure continues, along with the difficulty in providing services, the economic crisis, the problem of the Iraqi army, some sort of organized resistance movement could develop into guerrilla warfare," Alani said.
He said US troops had made serious blunders, notably in the town of Falluja, west of Baghdad, where he said anti-US attacks had begun as revenge for the killings of 15 youthful demonstrators by American forces in late April.
Alani said the Americans should have made amends in line with the Sunni town's tribal, conservative traditions by sending mediators to apologize, pay blood money and perhaps promise to build a new school in memory of the dead youngsters.
"They did nothing and they have paid a high price," he said, referring to attacks in the Falluja-Ramadi area, where he said Islamist radicals had later joined forces with vengeful townsfolk.
"You can't kill people and just walk away," he said.
Toby Dodge, an Iraq expert at Britain's Warwick University, said events in Falluja and elsewhere proved that the US military had no understanding of Iraqi society.
"I can't see how they can impose stability without it," he said.
Baath revivalists
He said that while remnants of Saddam's security services, drawn mainly from his home area of Tikrit, were behind much of the anti-US violence, non-Tikriti Baathists might also be orchestrating attacks in line with the party's ideology.
"These people believe in the Baath party's worship of a strong state, its chauvinistic nationalism directed against outsiders, and its paranoia of imperialism," Dodge said.
He said intrusive searches by British paratroopers of homes in a southern Shiite town had led to the killings of six British military police there, but there were few signs that majority Shiites were actively combating the occupation yet.
"The Shiites are playing a waiting game," he said. "But they are also arming and organizing."
The Shiites, long oppressed by Saddam's Sunni-dominated Baathists, want their share of power in the new Iraq, but for now are waiting to see what political structure emerges.
"If they don't get what they believe they deserve, we will get an intifada [uprising]," Alani predicted.
Classic counter-insurgency tactics require much more than the overwhelming force that US troops have largely relied on in efforts to crack down on Iraqi gunmen, bombers and saboteurs.
Ellie Goldsworthy, head of the UK Armed Forces program at RUSI, said it was vital to stop the 1 percent of Saddam loyalists from gaining recruits among the 99 percent of Iraqis who might be disgruntled, but not sworn foes of the Americans.
"I'm aghast at how ineptly the Americans have handled this," she said. "Some things are difficult to handle, others are cheap and easy, like smiling and talking to people with respect -- you don't wear sunglasses when you are trying to build rapport."
Goldsworthy said the US military was focused on protecting its own forces and loathe to take risks to create a more benign environment, as British forces have tried to do in the south.
"The American approach to dealing with Iraqis is very similar to the way Israelis deal with Palestinians," she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with