Teen pregnancy story shocks
I write with reference to your extremely misleading and poorly written lead article ("Taiwan tops list of single teen moms," June 29, page 1).
If the intention of the article was to shock, I must say you succeeded in shocking your readers with a sloppy standard of reporting that we are not accustomed to seeing in a quality newspaper such as the Taipei Times. The issues of abortion, teenage sexual activity, teenage motherhood and pregnancy out of wedlock are all mixed up together, so that despite repeated readings the article makes little sense and omits important information to support its sensationalist claims.
The article's failings start with its title. Although we are informed that 15 to 17 out of every 1,000 mothers in the country are teenagers, no mention is made of their marital status.
Furthermore, the list of neighboring countries that Taiwan is supposed to top appears to include just Japan and South Korea, where again no mention is made of the marital status of teenage mothers.
A more responsibly written article would have put Taiwan's figures in a worldwide perspective and clearly distinguished between single and married teenage mothers.
Second, the data presented to support the claim made in the title is curiously dated. According to the article, they refer to the period from 1986 to 1996. Other figures, which are pre-sented as evidence of increased sexual activity in teenagers refer to the period from 1980 to 1997.
If the report to which the article refers was released just the day before, one wonders what it contained that was new, and why such information was not reported. Perhaps it was just not shocking enough.
The most recent figures come from a survey by the Bureau of Health Promotion and refer to the period from 1995 to 2000. These figures show an increase in sexual activity among boys and girls, but without any mention of an age-group they are meaningless and confusing, particularly in the light of the much higher numbers mentioned in earlier paragraphs.
Given the ongoing topicality of teenage sexual activity in Taiwan, I look forward to reading a fuller and more coherent treatment of the subject in the pages of your newspaper soon.
Peter Jilks
Kaohsiung
Beware of China's trap
When China proposed its "one country, two systems" scheme about two decades ago, it set a trap for Taiwan. It never meant the coexistence of two systems; rather, it intended to have a big system and a small one, just like a cat and a mouse. Once a mouse gets into a trap, it will be swallowed by the cat. This is exactly what has happened to Hong Kong in just six years.
In order to gain the approval of Hong Kong's people and the nations of the free world, China promised that Hong Kong's system and way of life would be preserved for 50 years. It was a very attractive trap and fooled many of Hong Kong's people and the free world.
In 1997, China was so proud of its trick that a count-down clock was set up in Tiananmen Square.
Once the People's Liberation Army -- 4,000 troops' worth -- got into Hong Kong, Beijing didn't care what it had promised. Its main concern was how to convert the three branches of Hong Kong government into a Chinese system.
First, it appointed a pro-China puppet, Tung Chee-hwa (
Since these officials are appointed directly or indirectly by China, they need to be loyal only to Beijing.
Second, China replaced a democratically elected legislature with a Beijing-appointed legislature, despite the protest of the free world.
Third, the pro-China executive and legislative branches changed the territory's judicial procedure and officials to please China.
Finally, through the cooperation of the three branches of the pro-China government, Hong Kong now has many executive orders and laws that limit civil liberties, freedom of press and human rights, in the name of national security and preservation of social order.
Hong Kong's system has been converted from the rule of law to a pro-China role in a short period of time. All government officials are working hard to please China, instead of serving the people.
Thus, Hong Kong's experience clearly indicate that China does not have any intention of allowing the coexistence of two systems. The "one country, two systems" model is merely a trick to trap Taiwan.
In order to preserve its democracy and freedoms, Taiwan must resolutely reject the notion of "one China" under the promise of "one country, two systems."
Jim Chung
Coordinator, Coalition for Human Rights in Asia
Southfield, Michigan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with