Japan should apologize
I refer to the incident where a Mackay Memorial Hospital doctor visited Japan despite having experienced probable (albeit indirect) exposure to SARS patients. ("Diseased doctor's tour causes diplomatic trouble" May 18, 2003, Page 1)
Regrettably, the incident has been sensationalized by both the Japanese government and media alike -- without waiting for due evidence. Interestingly, the bus driver who had direct contact with the doctor has been found not to be suffering from SARS after all.
Does this not entail a reciprocal apology from the Japanese side to the people of Taiwan, who have suffered great indignation and condescension from as-yet baseless charges?
Many countries around the world have been reeling from the effects of SARS, Japan included. The unreasonable outbursts from the Japanese side clearly show a Japan that still does not have the nerve to confront the reality.
SARS originated from China, this much is irrefutable. However, clearly frustrated with their own humiliating inability to condemn China directly, the Japanese have found a convenient scapegoat in Taiwan (via this particular doctor -- an isolated incident no less) on whom to rest the blame. This is despite the fact that Taiwan has always been a loyal and true friend to Japan.
Although I have no doubt that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was right in apologizing for the incident as per international etiquette, one cannot help but desire a reciprocal gesture of friendship, civility and respect from the Japanese side.
After all, this particular doctor never had direct contact with SARS patients, nor did he exhibit SARS-like symptoms at the time of his departure -- how is the government accountable for this incident?
Even if Japan should find suspected SARS cases in the Kansai region henceforth, is it not reasonable to conclude that any number of international and/or domestic tourists in the region was/is a potential SARS carrier, including -- but certainly not limited to -- the doctor?
There are currently no barriers to entry at Japanese ports, no requests to take the temperature of inbound travellers, nor are there mandatory quarantine periods in existence. Should Japan therefore not shoulder its share of responsibility in combating the spread of SARS?
Taiwan's government and its 23 million citizens have been forced to tackle the SARS situation with little humanitarian assistance from the red-tape-bound WHO experts. The government has in place, however, some of the most stringent quarantine procedures amongst SARS-affected countries.
In our time of great difficulty and sadness, Taiwan surely deserves more than the arrogance and despicable accusations from numerous Japanese government officials and journalists.
My sincerest advice to the Japanese government and media is for those in leadership positions to grow a backbone and stand up to China, the WHO and the UN directly, if they should wish to condemn others for the SARS epidemic. Taiwan is not a pawn and will not accept being treated like one.
For our part, Taiwanese should also learn from this incident -- that we not only need to stop kowtowing to the Japanese without regard for facts, we also need to re-align issues of Taiwan's national security with the ever-deafening demands to open our country to the suspicious and clearly dishonest PRC leadership across the Strait. We need to find a safe and dignified equilibrium for the sake of our future generations.
Sadly, over 80 fellow Taiwanese have already perished at the hands of international injustice in our lone battle against SARS, more will sadly follow, but let them not die in vain.
So let us learn! Let us strengthen our resolve to find a voice of our own, not only to safeguard our safety, prosperity and national security, but especially for the love of our beautiful Formosa.
Jennifer Chen
Melbourne, Australia
Focus on real issues
Taiwan again has not been admitted to the World Health Organization (WHO) -- even though being a sovereign nation is not a requirement for membership. This doesn't feel good, but that's nothing new. The same with the UN.
But when I read in the newspaper the suggestion that in order to fight SARS, Taiwan should suspend all travel to China until Taiwan is admitted to the WHO, then I think that reason is getting hijacked by emotions.
The WHO membership and SARS are entirely different issues. We should now put the WHO membership behind us until next year and then reapply.
Concerning SARS, we should focus on the root causes of why the disease spread across the island boosting Taiwan to rank third on the worldwide list of current infections. Why have not all cases been reported properly from the beginning? Why would, and could, hospital officials conceal the threat?
Is everything being done to prevent further spreading? Do the hospitals have all the required equipment to protect doctors and nurses from contracting the disease? Do they get the relief they need?
What can be done to have more exchange for tired personnel in the hospitals? These are just a few of the questions that come to mind.
Focusing on these issues is the most professional thing to do now. I think much can be learned from answering these questions without bias.
Ralph Jensen
Kaohsiung County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with