On Friday, the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to prevent and control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), demonstrating that the ruling and opposition camps do have their priorities straight at this critical juncture in the country's history. Everyone agrees that the coming weeks will reveal whether the spread of the epidemic will escalate beyond control or be contained. Can the newly enacted regulations help stop the unthinkable? No one knows just yet. In any event, these regulations do constitute sincere efforts to address some important issues.
One noteworthy part of the new regulations is the so-called "Chen Ching-chiu (
Chen was a chief nurse at the Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital (
Her professionalism and dedication truly deserve the recognition and admiration of all. So, all the efforts to honor and commemorate her, including the decision to give Chen a place in the Martyrs Shrine (忠烈祠) are appropriate.
But one cannot help but think of more pragmatic issues. How many more such frontline losses must be endured before victory is realized in this battle? Unfortunately, more could be on the way. How will this impact the morale of all those medical personnel?
Under the circumstances, the "Chen Ching-chiu clause" is certainly praiseworthy. At least now, those working with SARS patients know that their loved ones will be taken care of if they should succumb to the atypical pneumonia, allowing them to focus on the battle at hand.
The clause has a wide scope, applicable to families of doctors, nurses, volunteer workers and any other personnel who perform duties to prevent and control the epidemic. This is a very important feature of the clause. Families of government employees, such as Chen Ching-chiu who worked for a municipal hospital, and members of the military are covered by the relevant civil servant and military personnel pension laws to begin with. But a vast number of individuals from the private sector, most notably doctors and nurses of private hospitals, are also serving important roles in the battle against the disease.
Another clause of the special regulations is a no-less human touch. According to the clause, the integrity and legal rights of SARS patients must be respected and protected. No discrimination against them is allowed. In view of the irrational behavior shown by the public out of their ignorance surrounding the ailment, this is indeed a badly needed clause.
The most glaring example is the case of a couple, surnamed Tsao (
Love and understanding, more than anything else, are needed to win this battle against SARS.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with