Since the pan-blue camp finalized its joint ticket featuring KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Presidential candidates always select their partners in the hope of adding to their electoral support, giving due consideration to each party's political maneuvers. Less emphasis, however, is put on overall national policy and development since the vice president is not given real power.
It is cause for concern that the vice president might end up becoming nothing more than an electoral tool if the post is used only for electoral considerations. At the same time, hype about running mates may distract voters from campaign platforms (all you need to do is put a political star on the ticket). We therefore need to reflect on the role and position of the vice president from a constitutional angle.
Basically, because the development of the Constitution has long been constrained by historical factors and the rule of man (as opposed to the rule of law), in addition to the profound influence of the US, the nation's constitutional system and power structure are tilting toward a presidential system. Although several constitutional amendments have sought to shift it toward a "semi-presidential" system, they often increased the president's power, rather than curtailing it.
In particular, since direct elections for the president and vice president were first held, all party leaders have viewed the presidency as their lifetime ambition.
Strategically, a presidential candidate always chooses his or her running mate out of consideration of his or her electoral support.
So Chen teamed up with Lu in 2000, aiming to achieve a gender balance and canvass support from female and pro-independence voters. The pairing of Soong with Chang Chao-hsiung (張昭雄) was meant to provide a counter-balance to Soong's mainlander image. The Lien-Siew ticket was based on the consideration of integrating administrative resources.
It is no different in presidential elections in the US. Presidential candidates there also pick their partners with an eye on increasing their electoral support. According to the US Constitution, the post of vice president is merely a stand-by position with no power. Political science scholars usually describe the US vice president as the "fifth wheel."
A look at Taiwan's constitutional history shows that most of the vice presidents during the KMT's autocratic rule did not have any policy-making power. Former vice president Li Yuan-tzu (李元簇), in office at the early years of former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) government, did a very good job in playing a silent role. After the first popular presidential election in 1996, Lien would not have been able to exercise any power as vice president if Lee had not appointed him to serve concurrently as premier.
Although constitutional amendments stipulate that presidential and vice presidential candidates must pair up on the same ticket and although the legitimacy of the public will and the voter base cannot be divided between the two, this does not mean that the president's power can be shared. The Constitution does not allow the vice president to ask for a role in policy-making unless he or she is authorized by the president to do so.
So even though the two candidates must run on the same ticket and be jointly held to scrutiny by the public, as stipulated in the constitution, the vice president is a spare tire at best, despite being constantly highlighted during election campaigns.
As the speculation continues as to who will be Chen's partner, we should reflect on whether the "chicken rib" role played by the vice president is appropriate. Since recent constitutional amendments have shifted toward establishing a semi-presidential system, we might do well to emulate the systems adopted in France and South Korea. France does not have a vice president. If the president passes away or cannot continue in office, the head of the National Assembly will take over until a new president is elected.
Presidential candidates simply want to showcase their dream-team partners to back their platforms, but those partners cannot put forward concrete policies for national development. The pairings risk becoming nothing more than marriages of convenience to divide up the political spoils. That being the case, how do presidential elections facilitate democratic development?
Wang Tuoh is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with