SARS might heal China
What's striking about severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is how easily the current situation could have been averted if the disease had been caught at an early stage.
If it had first broken out in a modern democracy like Taiwan, there wouldn't be the danger of a global epidemic today. But SARS had its birth in one of those backward places ruled by a small band of strongmen.
If the American adventure in Iraq has done anything, it has shown just how fragile such a regime can be in the bright spotlight of the media. Any little thing that blows the ruling party's cover can do it in. A display of American tanks in the center of Baghdad and the whole Iraqi regime collapses unexpectedly, like a house of cards.
What holds such a dictatorship up in the first place is the people's fear that nothing could possibly prevail against it. Those in power will stop at nothing to sustain this illusion. They know it only takes a pinprick to explode their scheme.
Controlling information is what they're all about. Just a momentary flash of fear appeared on Nicolai Ceaucesceau's face when an unruly bunch inadvertently stumbled into the square where he was delivering a routine speech. If he hadn't been on TV, no one would have seen it and his iron rule of Romania wouldn't have unraveled at such lightning speed.
How quickly the former Soviet Union came apart after the accident at Chernobyl. Nations all across Europe registered the radiation before the Soviet Union finally admitted Chernobyl. How embarrassing. What a "loss of face" for the Communists. Things have been changing fast in Russia ever since.
In SARS, we're seeing the Chinese Chernobyl. Before the whole world and before their own people, the leaders in Beijing have egg on their faces.
A lot more of us are likely to get sick and die from SARS before this is over. But, on the other hand, this one little virus may already be doing what Tianamen Square couldn't. SARS might heal China.
William Stimson
Wufeng, Taichung
Not a little emporer
While sharing the concerns of Liou To-hai ("Bush and Kim: the `little emperors'"April 26, p.8) over the emergence of an international "game of chicken" between North Korea and the US, I take exception to his placing US President George W. Bush in the same league with North Korean leader Kim Jong-il as a "little emperor."
Political systems and the freedom of speech and expression cherished in the US, but feared in Pyongyang, matter. There was never any serious doubt that Kim Jong-il would succeed his father. The fact that Kim may spend billions on developing nuclear weapons while North Koreans eat grass roots means either: (1) Kim truly is the Dear Leader to his people; (2) North Koreans are especially bovine people who can be led by the nose to accept, do, or believe anything; or (3) the Kims, both father and son, control a very effective security apparatus that need not respect an independent judiciary.
In contrast, Bush's presidency was an open question until the US Supreme Court settled the nearly 50-50 election of 2000. Nobody in the USA disappeared or was put in jail for raising questions of Bush's early problems with alcohol abuse, voting for Al Gore, for calling Bush a nincompoop, or even for questioning some of the policies put in place since the Sept. 11 attacks.
If Bush cannot manage other issues as well as he managed Gulf War II, he will have to change jobs next year. Further, as Bush's fellow Christian, albeit a possible voter for his opponent next year, I doubt Bush sees himself as "the savior of Christianity." Bush, like all other Christians, reserves that role for Jesus Christ.
Peter Herz
Taichung
A timely article
Major kudos to Emma Bonino for her outstanding article ("It's time for a ceasefire in the largely ignored war on drugs," April 16, page 9). However, the war on drugs has not been ignored on this side of the globe.
The war on drugs has transformed the former "Land of Liberty"into the most incarcerated nation in history. With less than 5 percent of the world's population, the US has greater than 25 percent of the world's prisoners, thanks primarily to our counter-productive war on certain (politically selected) drugs.
The US has been attempting to nullify the immutable law of supply and demand for almost 90 years. (It started with the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914). The net result is that we still have the same percentage of our citizens addicted to drugs now as we had 90 years ago. (About 1.3 percent of our adult population).
My advice to Taiwan and the rest of the world: carefully observe US drug policy -- then do the opposite. Don't follow us -- we're lost.
Kirk Muse
Mesa, Arizona
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with