More than 30 opposition lawmakers have endorsed a bill to amend the qualification requirements for the president and vice president of the Judicial Yuan. The move is a clear indication that no one is ready to give up trying to mix politics with justice and the law. Unfortunately, this habit is extremely hazardous to the progress of judicial reform.
According to the opposition bill, the top two officials in the Judicial Yuan could not be older than 65 years of age and must have sat on the Council of Grand Justices for at least three years. Taken at face value, neither condition would appear to be unreasonable. However, it just so happens that such requirements, if enacted, would disqualify two of the three top candidates for these offices.
Judicial Yuan President Weng Yueh-sheng (翁岳生) is 71. He was one of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) law professors and has a very close personal relationship with Chen. Grand Justice Lai In-jaw's (
Passage of the bill would virtually guarantee the third candidate -- Judicial Yuan Vice President Cheng Chung-Mo (
Word on the street has it that Cheng hasn't been on good terms with Weng. Conspiracy theorists are also making much of the fact that the KMT lawmaker who spearheaded the bill reportedly sought a job in the Judicial Yuan in the past -- unsuccessfully, of course.
There is another bill to amend the Organic Law of the Judicial Yuan that has been languishing before the Legislative Yuan for quite a while. This bill was submitted by the Judicial Yuan and based entirely on the conclusions reached by the National Judicial Reform Conference in 1999 -- a conference spearheaded by the then KMT government. This bill does not have an age limit or minimum Council of Grand Justices tenure requirement. It is ironic that KMT lawmakers have now submitted a bill that contradicts the result of the 1999 conference their party pushed for. The move appears to be another case of opposing a the DPP government just for the sake of stirring up trouble.
In addition, such strict requirements for the judiciary's top jobs is almost unheard of. The proposed age cap is a joke. In fact, in more advanced countries, this might be seen as a case of age discrimination. There is no age cap for the nation's president or vice president or for heads of the four other branches of government. If an identical age cap were imposed on the presidency and vice presidency, neither KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
At a time when the pan-blue camp is being jeered for practicing "old men politics," it is truly touching to see some of their own lawmakers standing up to prove people wrong by ensuring that younger folks will get a crack at at least one top job.
Nevertheless, passage of the bill would impose restrictions on the right of the president to make appointments.
It also would taint the nation's top judicial jobs with a political stain that would be hard to erase. The bill should not be passed.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with