Jones is no victim
As a US attorney and former journalist, I must object that your article "Woman cries foul on US court system" (Nov. 28, page 2) is a sorry excuse for a "news" story and fails to meet the basic journalistic requirement of balance and thoroughness.
The position of the US court to have Jones appear in person is clearly NOT based on racial discrimination as it would apply equally to ANYONE of any color who found themselves in Jones' circumstance.
The facts as presented by Jones and her representative Lee are indeed unfortunate and deserve sympathy. However, it is for the court to decide if what Jones is saying is factual, not for a single legislative representative (read self-serving politician). This is the foundation of the rule of law in US society.
I simply don't believe "white" lawyers in California would not represent Jones based on race. This is beyond ludicrous and would if true be a basis for disbarment of any such individual.
If Jones can't afford the fees quoted by a lawyer, I can't see that there is any blame on the attorney.
I don't believe the US judiciary forced Jones to marry a US citizen, live in the US and give birth to a child who benefits from US citizenship. It is those facts which are at the root of the US court's assertion of jurisdiction.
In trying to find a fair and just resolution to what sounds like a tragic situation and protect the interests of a child, it is only proper that the court require all parties to appear.
Next time call me or one of my colleagues to comment on a story like this.
Your one-sided reporting as represented in the Jones article is harmful to many interests and, in the long run, to US-Taiwan relations.
Joseph M. Lovell, JD
Editor's note: The article was a news report filed by the CNA, not by this newspaper's staff reporters; also, the report was about the allegations made by PFP lawmaker Lee Yung-ping and Jones, and did not necessarily represent the facts of the case.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more