Large army not the answer
There are some 260,000 conscripts within the Taiwanese armed forces. Not only do most of these young men consider their military service to be a waste of time, but it means that the most able part of the population is lost to the economy during the most productive part of their lives. All that is gained in return is a large army of debatable value. However, the latest proposal to provide conscripts to the high-tech industry seems little better than forced labor.
Taiwan is an island nation -- it shares no borders with China -- any invasion from across the Strait must come by air or sea. Why then aren't Taiwan's limited resources concentrated on building up its air force and navy? History is full of examples of small island nations successfully defending themselves against continental powers with forces of well-equipped professionals. The only possible reason for maintaining such a large army is that some elements within the ministry of defense still dream of "re-taking the mainland."
History is also full of nations whose outmoded thought has consigned them to the rubbish bin.
Gilman Grundy
Miaoli
WTO status not a panacea
Your recent editorials "Reading between the lines" (July 7, p8) and "Taiwan isn't the same as Hong Kong" (July 7, p8) have addressed many intertwining issues of the predicament facing the Taiwan economy.
It is true that separate membership in the WTO does not afford the luxury of a sovereign recognition, but neither does the WTO framework give away the farm for establishing direct trading links with China. In truth, the WTO status is really a discernible firewall around Taiwan's limbo status and the noted commentaries on the Taiwan reality are beginning to better illuminate these hidden messages for exposing just exactly how the "one China" policy is not a political status reality. The idea that Taiwan is becoming a "Hong Kong SAR" because of some PRC direct links is ludicrous, and your enlightening commentaries have clearly noted that such direct links alone cannot establish that there is now a final resolution of the Taiwan Question for the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
If anything, being so unambiguously defined as a separate customs territory by the trade laws of nations is in itself a major international trade barrier to any Chinese political incursions. The internationally recognized basis of the trade membership status of Taiwan is as a separate territorial unit to the China mainland and this fact only further demarcates a WTO framework within the "one China" policy. Insightful editorials help a world of concerned readers to comprehend these "one China" policy nuances and to see a consistent subtext of the policy commissars revealed between the lines of the legal fine print of the "one China" policy: the Taiwan WTO status is not currently part of China. Not yet.
Jeff Geer
Las Vegas
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with