The people of Taiwan face important choices in the Dec. 1 city and county chief and legislative elections. It needs to be said that the viewpoints and rhetoric articulated during the campaign constantly reflect the fact that we are still constrained by historical feuds and other divisive factors. As a result, we have heard mainly scurrilous attacks, but have seen few far-sighted political platforms. This situation truly worries all those concerned about Taiwan's future.
This reminds me of the inspiration contained in The Gospel of Luke (Luke 5:4-10). As he addressed his disciple, Simon (Peter), Jesus saw that he had "worked hard all night but caught nothing" as he tried to catch fish. He then asked Simon to "put out into deep water." Although doubtful, Simon followed Jesus' words. As a result, "they caught such a large number of fish that their nets began to break. So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them."
This biblical description of Simon working hard all night and yet catching nothing reflects Taiwan's situation. Even though we enjoy the democratic right to take part in the political process, we have been constantly engaged in superficial quarrels and ideological conflict. Not only does this cost the country dearly, but the situation might even get worse. Uneasiness and distrust among the public will trigger further clashes.
Taiwan's political elite -- including all the city and county chief and legislative candidates, and especially the leaders of the major parties -- are absolutely obliged to lead the 23 million people of Taiwan toward deep water so that they can clearly see the real problems, challenges and opportunities facing Taiwan. They should then propose strategies in response and help to realize the peoples' hopes.
Taiwan's problems include crises in public order and family values, rising unemployment, labor rights disputes, poverty among Aboriginal communities, educational rights disputes, a sharp decrease in investment due to lack of business confidence and the challenges facing the society and economy after accession to the WTO. These are the matters with which society should concern itself and the key issues for voters in the elections.
If a political party fails to meet voters' expectations on these issues, there is no reason whatsoever to support such a party and its candidates.
I call on the responsible and far-sighted parties of Taiwan to immediately stop the meaningless war of words and the use of ethnic issues to provoke conflict for political gain. They should instead respond to Taiwan's deep-seated needs and problems. Only in this way can we recognize the importance of ethnic harmony and embrace the challenges and promises that our young century has in store.
Paul Shan is a Roman Catholic cardinal, based in Kaohsiung.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with