Two KMT legislative candidates known as members of the "pro-localization" faction -- Chen Horng-chi (
Under KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (
In doing so, the KMT has abandoned the pro-localization voter base, which accounts for 80 percent of all votes. Meanwhile, the conflict over the KMT's future continues to percolate within the party, to which the two Chens' latest move is but an early pre-election overture.
There are at least three scenarios for the post-election KMT. It could maintain the "pan-blue" alliance with the PFP and New Party and try to wrest Cabinet-forming power from the DPP government -- if the alliance can obtain a legislative majority. Or the pan-blue alliance could crumble and the KMT remain the opposition party. Or the KMT could build a coalition with the DPP, create a stable legislative majority and share administrative resources with the DPP.
The likelihood of the third option is pretty slim, given that voices within the party calling for cooperation with the DPP have been suppressed since the government halted construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant -- right after a meeting between Lien and President Chen Shui-bian (
But cooperating with the DPP is not just a campaign strategy for the KMT, it should be a serious option after Dec. 1. KMT insiders have admitted that grassroots supporters are sick and tired of all the partisan wrangling and long to see the different parties cooperate to stabilize the political situation. Many pro-localization voters are also very unhappy with the way the KMT has handled Lee in the campaign, as well as the party's heavily pro-China platform.
On the other hand, the PFP's ambitions to co-opt the pan-blue camp are also making many KMT members unhappy. They believe the KMT should leave more leeway for partisan cooperation instead of letting PFP Chairman James Soong (
All of this is putting tremendous pressure on KMT candidates.
As the elections draw near, the misgivings generated during the campaign will subtly influence the post-poll partisan reshuffle. The DPP has launched a tough offensive, naming names of those who helped block or defeat specific public welfare and development budgets. This no-holds-barred campaign has thoroughly infuriated its targets. Meanwhile, since the many factions within the pan-blue camp nominated more candidates than their voter base can support, internecine battles are wracking the alliance. The winners will capture the seats they sought, but at what cost?
Taiwan's politicians are good at calculating the pros and cons of political maneuvers, but not at planning long-term projects. Party leaders should seriously consider building a new political order after the elections. If they allow the election battle to rage without restraint, it will be all that much harder to build a new order from rubble -- and harmful for Taiwan's long-term prospects.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with