Just when we start to think that Taiwanese men have finally decided to join the rest of us in the 21st century, some knuckle-dragging throwback to the days of "Chung nan, ching nu" (
One such incident involves an internal memo circulated by the personnel department of the Chinese Industrial Development Bank (
As a Taiwanese female, I am used to the myriad ways in which men discriminate against women here, but the sexism in this memo was so blatant it demanded a response.
What possible reason could the bank have for ordering women not to wear pants? In Western nations, pants are the clothing of choice for working women simply because they are comfortable and convenient (something men have known for centuries). As any woman will tell you, skirts can be a nuisance: if they are too long, they get in the way when you walk, but if they are too short, you have to guard your modesty carefully every time you sit down.
In Taiwan, many women ride scooters to work, and skirts are a definite handicap. When driving, you have to be careful not to flash oncoming traffic, but at the same time, you have to hike your skirt up in order to place a leg on either side of the scooter for balance when you stop. The situation gets even worse if you have to ride as a passenger.
Remember when women used to ride sidesaddle on the backs of scooters? This was in fact the only way to ride while wearing a skirt because it allowed you to keep your legs together. It was also an extremely dangerous practice, and the government eventually banned sidesaddle "scootering."
Unfortunately, they were unable to stop companies from forcing their female employees to wear skirts, which means that every day thousands of women still have to struggle to preserve their dignity while commuting.
Given a choice, many women may well prefer to wear skirts, but the decision should be left to the individual. If pants are considered appropriate office attire for men, why not allow women to enjoy the same comfort and convenience?
Sadly, the simple logic of this argument has failed to sway many of the nation's bosses. Many companies with uniformed staff still provide females with tight, short skirts while the men wear pants. Even in companies without uniforms, women are "encouraged" to wear skirts in the belief that this is proper attire for females.
The China Industrial Development Bank stands out simply because its memo made explicit a widely followed but generally unwritten rule prohibiting women from wearing pants. The fact that the bank was bold enough to put this rule in writing indicates that the male management sees nothing wrong with this sexist attitude.
When pressed by reporters, senior staff at the bank stated that custom and etiquette require women to wear dresses. Well, I have a news flash for these fellows: if old customs never changed, we women would still be hobbling around on bound feet, while the men would be tripping over their queues.
These men will have to modernize their views on women in the workplace, and they had better do it sooner rather than later. If not, we will just have to send Vice President Annette Lu (
Bonnie Hsieh is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
[Editors note: The bank has reversed its policy. See story on page 2]
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with