Missing the point
The media's coverage of the possible paroling and admission to National Taiwan Univer-sity's (NTU) sociology department of a serial rapist is especially interesting in that it highlights certain attitudes.
The issue seems not to be whether there should be any prospect of freedom for a man just six years after he was jailed for raping at least 30 women, but whether he should be allowed to study at NTU -- as if college campuses are the only places where women exist!
Every year violent criminals are released from Taiwan's jails. But it's unusual for the media to ask whether these people are going to find themselves in situations that make recidivism more likely.
The media's concern in this case probably stems from the fact that many influential people have daughters at NTU. Either that, or university students are seen as needing more care and protection than the rest of us.
I have the feeling that if the inmate was expected to live in a blue-collar part of town -- and perhaps work in a factory -- then few would be showing much interest in his case.
Steven Crook
Taipei
A brute, but not Brutus
Your comparison of James Soong (宋楚瑜) to Brutus is inappropriate ("Seeing the handwriting on the wall, Aug 9, page 8).
In Julius Caesar, Shakes-peare portrays Brutus' tragic character through his permission to Antony, his obvious enemy, to give a public speech.
Brutus is a just and generous man, but one who misunderstands Roman politics. Soong's ambition is to become president of Taiwan. He is politically astute and cunning.
If Soong had toppled Lee Teng-hui (
An appropriate comparison to Soong might be Tsao Chao (
Ni Kuo-jung
Hsinchu City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with