Once hailed as the ROC's "anti-communist patriots" for hijacking a Chinese passenger plane from China to South Korea in 1983, Zhuo Changren (
The six hijackers of the Chinese plane, with Zhuo as their leader, were detained, prosecuted, convicted and jailed in South Korea for a year and three months before being quietly sent to Taiwan in August of 1984. The Taiwan government went all out supporting them, even hiring defense attorneys for them in South Korea.
The ruckus over the Los Angeles Olympic Games provided the necessary smoke screen. Out of a worship of "anti-communist patriots," the colonial-style KMT regime which then governed Taiwan with an iron fist hailed them as "heros," rather than "hijackers."
The day after their arrival in Taiwan, they were received by then president Chiang Ching-kuo (
Ironically, as a result of such privileged treatment for their "patriotism," Zhuo and Jiang came to think only of themselves. They felt that Taiwan owed them, partly because, compared with Chinese pilots who directly defected to Taiwan in fighter jets, the reward money Zhuo and Jiang received was on the small side.
Coming from China's socialist "paradise," they were like helpless infants in Taiwan's capitalistic society. They had no concept of saving or investment and their money was quickly spent. After Zhuo lost all his money in investments, he decided to teamed up with Jiang to commit a kidnapping for ransom.
The two men's executions came after more than nine years of appeals against their sentences. While their executions were anticipated, they are nevertheless thought-provoking. One cannot help but ask what good has been accomplished from Taiwan's adherence to anti-communism and the price that has had to be paid for it. As a buttress of the KMT's ugly martial law regime, it wrecked many more lives than those of these two kidnappers. We can only hope that the execution of these two men means that the curtain has finally fallen on Taiwan's anti-communist farce.
After Zhuo and Jiang were sentenced to death, politics continued to meddle with criminal justice. Sung Hsin-lien (宋心濂), then chief of the National Security Bureau, visited them in detention. (Sung had been the first high-ranking intelligence official appointed by Chiang Ching-kuo to visit them in South Korea in 1983.) Sung instructed the Ministry of Justice to delay their execution. What an irony that after they received a death sentence, the prosecutor in the case Chu Chen-pei (邱鎮北) was arrested and convicted on corruption charges. One wonders how a corrupt prosecutor could have impartially dealt with such a highly political case. Later, a judge contacted another of the six hijackers to tell him that he had evidence to prove that Zhuo had been tortured by the prosecutor. The judge had hoped the man would come to Zhuo and Jiang's defense, but the request was rejected.
Nobody looks good in this case. Certainly the executed men were no angels. But politics and criminal justice became tangled up and anti-communist fever actually took priority over universally accepted values. The slogan used to be that that fighting against communism was no sin under any circumstances, a belief which was not only contemptibly vindictive but, as one might expect from the Chiang family, amazingly stupid, resulting as it did in Taiwan's isolation from the world community.
Zhuo and Jiang left the world on Friday. Let us hope that the anti-communist fervor that has caused so much grief in Taiwan went with them.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with