Recently the chorus in Taiwan baying for capitulation to China's demands regarding acceptance of the "one China" principle as a precondition for talks has become deafening. Last week Formosa Plastics boss Wang Yung-ching (
If proverbially one can tell a lot about a man from the company he keeps, you can also tell a lot about an idea from those who hold it. One look at the ugly mixture of has-beens, wannabes and the nakedly ambitious that make up the "one China" chorus and those with common sense should reject the idea out of hand.
Of course, common sense is rarely to be found in Taiwan's political opposition. But it does seem to be gaining ground in Washington. Not only has the administration of George W. Bush taken a far more robust line on arms sales and defense to Taiwan than his predecessor would ever have done, but senior officials involved in Asian affairs are also beginning to see sense about China-Taiwan negotiations. This is partly a result of the Bush team being more realistic about relations with China.
The price for China letting Bill Clinton in 1997 appear to have a foreign policy success with the announcement of a "strategic partnership" was a shocking abandonment of US principles toward Taiwan, in particular Clinton's switch from the previous US position that it "acknowledged" ie, understood Beijing's "one China" position to "embraced," ie, agreed with this position. On top of this, Clinton was outspoken in his refusal to acknowledge the right of the people of Taiwan to self-determination. What made Clinton's position doubly odious was that the US was at the time trying to pressure Taiwan and China into resuming talks while, in acquiescing to Beijing's denial of equality between the two governments, weakening Taiwan's negotiating position to that of a conquered foe. That Taiwan refused to behave as the Clintonites wished did it no favors and the nation only gained it the reputation of being a "troublemaker."
How refreshing it is therefore to see a cross-strait policy emerge which pays some attention to realities. Beijing's preconditions for restarting talks with Taiwan are absurd and US officials are beginning to say so.
For example Torkel Patterson, the White House's chief Asia expert, said last week that there should be no preconditions for talks. This comes on top of Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly saying that talks should be resumed and that while the US did not intend to play a role, it had an "abiding interest" in the peaceful resolution of cross-strait differences. All this on top of the arms sales and Bush's statement about defending Taiwan in case of a Chinese attack should be sending a clear message to Beijing. That is that it should talk to Taiwan, that its current conditions for doing so are preposterous and should be dropped, that the US will not abide any attempt to militarily intimidate Taiwan, and that it will maintain Taiwan's military capabilities at parity with the PRC to ensure that this does not happen.
All of this is very good news, but how ironic it is that the White House is now becoming a more steadfast guardian of Taiwan's political rights than so many of its own politicians.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with