The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statist-ics (DGBAS, 主計處) recently said that the domestic unemployment rate jumped to 3.73 percent last month -- a new high for Feb-
ruary and the highest rate for a single month since September 1985. The number of people affected by unemployment has risen to 937,000. How can one possibly not worry about the unemployment problem?
If we let the problem worsen, it will develop into a social and political problem that is more difficult to deal with. Improving the local investment environment and boosting national competitiveness are the fundamental ways to prevent the jobless rate from climbing and to restore economic growth. Some crucial approaches include improving the government's administrative efficiency and coordination among government agencies, studying and revising labor policies and regulations, speeding up the construction of public infrastructure, and establishing harmonious cross-strait relations.
Regarding the first problem, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (張俊雄) recently criticized administrative lapses, highlighting the seriousness of the problem. An inefficient government has become an obstacle to industrial competitiveness. We may as well forget about helping corporations boost their capacity to promote employment.
As far as studying and revising labor policies and regulations is concerned, the government should, for example, turn the labor pension fund into a personal savings fund. More job training programs should be organized to help ease the predicament facing middle-aged and older laborers changing careers. Some industrial leaders believe that the 42-hour workweek policy is the main cause of the rising unemployment rate and massive corporate layoffs aimed at cutting labor costs.
I think that it would be better for the government to request industries to increase labor productivity than to ask them to give employees generous benefits. For example, the government should demand that corporations provide workers with minimum hours of vocational training each year. In this way, both domestic competitive power and employees' skills can be improved. Today many unemployed workers in traditional industries cannot meet the working requirements of the electronic age, such as computer skills and basic English. No wonder they face difficulties when they change jobs.
In regard to the construction of public infrastructure, it should be noted that infrastructure is an immovable factor of production, and can enormously influence business costs and competitiveness. The International Institute for Management Development and the World Economic Forum regard infrastructure as a key factor when assessing a country's competitive capacity. Speeding up the construction of infrastructure can cut business costs, boost investment and create more job opportunities.
And finally, economists are all aware that China will be both one of the most important markets in the world and indispensable to Taiwan's economic development. Whether Taiwan can turn the savage shark of politics into a tame whale of economics and share China's rich resources will be the key to making Taiwan's economic prosperity last. Our leaders must therefore be very cautious when handling political and economic exchanges with China. Speeding up the opening of Taiwan to Chinese tourists and the implementation of the "big three links" (大三通) are the main issues on which we should work.
I hope the government can take this wave of unemployment seriously and respond with practical moves. Let's not let it snowball and become another Pachang Creek
Lee Jen-sin is an associate professor in the department of finance at I-shou University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with