Tomorrow, farmers' associations across Taiwan are set to hold elections, with the polls for fishermen's associations set for next month. These grassroots-level cooperatives are seen as the power base of local factions in rural areas because their elections can directly influence local government elections and the balance of power. These "small-scale" polls are therefore seen as an overture to the year-end legislative, city and county elections.
Intimidation by gangsters, violence and vote-buying have become the most salient features of these elections, because local factions have so much stake in them. Association board members are elected through a block vote method. They in turn elect the chairperson and CEO. Such a system has created a winner-takes-all situation, allowing the victorious faction all-out control of an association -- especially the treasured credit cooperatives. Lacking reasonable supervision from other parties, the credit cooperatives all too often fall into the hands of just a few people, which has often lead to serious problems with illegal or bad loans.
According to statistics released by a legislator last December, the credit cooperatives of farmers' associations have a staggering ratio of 15.7 percent non-performing loans. Council of Agriculture Chairman Chen Hsi-huang
The problems inherent in Taiwan's local elections and grassroots financial institutions have their roots in these associations. Naturally, the KMT does not want to change the structure of associations because they have helped the party consolidate its power base in the past by establishing a symbiosis of interests with local factions. Since coming to power, the DPP government has tried to reform, through legislation, the organization, operations -- and especially elections -- of the associations. But the KMT has stalled review of the bill in the Legislative Yuan.
Reforming the farmers' and fishermen's associations will be a first step in salvaging local politics and grassroots financial institutions. First of all, farmers' and fishermen's credit cooperatives are no longer compatible with the needs of Taiwan society. In readiness for WTO accession, the government should encourage the establishment of larger farms and increase competitiveness. The government should also crack down on irregularities and bad loans in the cooperatives, and merge these institutions into specialized banks. The associations, meanwhile, should specialize in providing guidance in the production and sale of agricultural products.
The election mechanisms of the associations also need a major overhaul. Block voting should be replaced with a direct vote or a limit vote method in order to ensure that different factions can have their candidates elected and that no single faction can monopolize power. To prevent "black gold" infiltration, people with criminal records should also be barred from the posts of chairperson and CEO.
Even though the legislative amendments have run into obstacles, this does not mean efforts to bring about reforms in the associations have been halted. The Ministry of Justice has ordered an all-out crackdown on vote-buying. Prosecutors nationwide are already handling 130 such cases. Even though the crackdown will not change the structural problems, it could still be an effective antidote to tackle the symptoms of black gold politics.
We call on both the ruling and opposition parties to face up to the future impact of WTO entry on Taiwan's farming industries. To this end, we call for swift passage of the legislative amendments and structural changes in the farmers' and fishermen's associations, all of which will lay the foundation for grassroots political and economic reforms.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with