President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has again come up with new thinking on cross-strait relations in his New Year remarks. Compared to the "four no's plus one" of his May 20 presidential inauguration speech, the New Year speech adopted a more proactive and positive note. Compared to the DPP's traditional arguments, Chen's speech has made a breakthrough in three respects:
First, Chen said: "Under the ROC Constitution, `one China' should not be an issue." This is the first time the new government has officially echoed "one China in accordance with the [ROC] Constitution" in the present tense, in contrast to its previous "future one China" dictum. In other words, it has pronounced "one China, with each side having its own interpretation" on the basis of the ROC Constitution, transcending the dispute over whether or not to accept the "one China principle."
Second, Chen said: "Both sides of the Taiwan Strait came from the same family" and that they "wish to live under the same roof." He also added: "The integration of our economies, trade, and culture can be a starting point for gradually building faith and confidence in each other. This, in turn, can be the basis for a new framework of permanent peace and political integration."
The "same roof" idea is reminiscent of the "rooftop theory," which served as a model for German reunification. It recognizes that the two sides can try to build some kind of common framework as a cross-strait policymaking mechanism. "Political integration" is an attempt at transcending all unification-independence disputes and a move toward a more pluralistic model -- a quest for ideological reconciliation between the National Unification Council (NUC, 國統會) and the President's Advisory Group on Cross-strait Affairs (跨黨派小組).
Thirdly, Chen has also vowed to include cross-strait economic and trade issues into global market considerations before Taiwan's entry into the WTO. Chen also said he would adopt the new perspective of "positive openness with effective management," prepare a macro-economic plan for Taiwan and direct it toward a knowledge-based economy.
At a New Year gathering shortly afterward, Chen said the "big three links" will be opened around the time both Taiwan and China enter the WTO, and that the Ministry of Economic Affairs will also revise the "no haste, be patient" policy and ease the restrictions on investments in China.
The fact that Chen has opened up new lines of thought on the cross-strait issue is an indication that he is determined to seek breakthroughs and defuse both internal and external troubles. In strategic terms, the move toward "one China with each side having its own interpretation in accordance with the ROC Constitution" will help the two sides work around the "one China" dispute. It will also free the new Taiwan government from word games like "one China" and the "1992 consensus," and allay criticism from Beijing and Taiwan's opposition parties.
The idea of "political integration under the same roof" will be beneficial in the event of a merger between the NUC and the President's Advisory Group on Cross-Strait Affairs. The word "unification" may then be changed to "union," bringing both the unification and independence theories into a broader framework. Even though neither the pro-unification nor pro-independence camps will be satisfied with this, they will be able to take what they want from the new framework.
President Chen's new cross-strait thinking will help the DPP gain initiative and allow it to become a more responsible, creative and accommodating ruling party.
Julian Kuo is an associate professor of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with