Policy-making on the 84-hour workweek and "small three links" fully reflects the superficiality and hollowness of the government.
The government has stirred up a constitutional dispute by firmly refusing to implement the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project, which had already been passed by the legislature. The dispute is yet to be resolved.
Also, instead of filing a "reconsideration proposal" (
Both these events reflect a lack of in-depth research and solid action. And then there's the forced implementation of the "small three links," in which there was no discussion and no consideration given to the other side's wishes. This unilateral policy fails to take into account objective realities and constitutes rash, superficial administrative behavior.
The "hollowing out of the economy" is a term with which everyone in the country is familiar, reflecting the economic crisis that occurred following the exodus of Taiwan's small and medium-sized businesses to China and other foreign destinations. No one, however, has been aware of the administrative hollowing out taking place. Increased incidences of "black gold" in county and township administrations, administrative decrees that are outdated and neglect the public interest, lagging development in the area of administrative law studies, and administrative teams that lack legal expertise, ethical grounding, and professional research -- all of these constantly reduce administrative efficiency, and conspire to cause the "hollowing out" of the administration.
These matters involve the rights and interests of the public. In February 1999, the legislature passed the Administrative Procedure Law (
In the wave of globalization driving the new century, it might perhaps be difficult to prevent businesses from leaving the country, or the hollowing out of the economy. The administration could have avoided superficiality and hollowness by changing its subjective ideology and governing in the spirit of the Constitution and according to the law. Avoiding hollowness in government would, moreover, help to alleviate and slow down the hollowing out of the economy. But if the cart is put before the horse, and the real problem of administrative hollowness is not faced squarely -- resulting in attempts to solve financial problems and unemployment issues through ritualistic pow-wows such as the National Economic Development Conference or National Administrative Reform Conference -- the administration will only continue to float aimlessly in a sea of political slogans and rantings.
Whether or not Taiwan sinks or swims in the new century rests entirely on the actions of those currently in power.
Lin Terng-yaw is a law professor at Tunghai University.
Translated by Scudder Smith and Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with