"Testilying" is American police slang for lying under oath. It is a combination of the words "testimony" and "lying." It is also an interesting and accurate way to describe the common situation of police lying in criminal trial courts both in the US and in Taiwan.
This lesson in American police slang comes to mind due to the recent conviction in Taipei District Court of police officer Chang Yao-sheng (張耀昇) (page 1, Aug. 31). Chang, who was a supervising officer, was found guilty by the court of having fabricated details of his involvement, or more correctly his non-involvement, with the capture of the defendants in the high profile Pai Hsiao-yen (白曉燕) kidnap murder case several years ago. In essence he filed false reports and then perjured himself in court. I would conjecture that the only reason he did not get away with it was because fellow officers testified against him. The reason for the unusual split in the "Blue Curtain" of police silence was the fact that everybody wanted to get their full and accurate credit and fame for their parts in the shootout. The cops that were there were disinclined to divide the fame with cops who weren't; even with supervisors who weren't.
The case is unusual in a sense and usual in another sense. It is unusual in that a senior police officer was convicted of perjury based on the testimony of fellow officers. It was usual in that cops routinely lie under oath.
Serious commentators from both a prosecution and criminal defense background acknowledge the specter of police perjury. Alan Dershowitz is a well known criminal defense attorney, law professor, popular author and legal commentator in the US. As Professor Dershowitz has pointed out: "Police perjury in criminal cases -- particularly in the context of searches and other exclusionary rule issues -- is so pervasive that the former police chief of San Jose and Kansas City has estimated that hundreds of thousands of law-enforcement officers commit felony perjury every year testifying about drug arrests alone." Professor Irving Younger who was professor of law at New York University echoes Professor Dershowitz's thoughts on police perjury. He was also a former federal prosecutor. He has written: "Every lawyer who practices in the criminal courts knows that police perjury is commonplace. The reason is not hard to find. Policemen see themselves as fighting a two-front war against, on the one hand, criminals in the street, and, on the other, against `liberal' rules of law in court. All's fair in this war, including the use of perjury to subvert `liberal' rules of law that might free those who `ought' to be jailed."
Although both of these law professors were referring to the situation in the American criminal justice system, many Taiwanese legal scholars and practitioners would assert that Taiwan's criminal justice system suffers from exactly the same malaise; that is, rampant police perjury and falsified reports.
All of this raises the question of why the police routinely lie under oath.
Professor Darryl Wood of the University of Alaska puts forward this "rationale" for police "testilying." He lists five core beliefs of the police subculture:
First, the police view themselves as the only real crime fighters.
Second, no one else understands them; non-police do not understand what police work is all about.
Third, loyalty to each other; police officers have to stick together because everyone is out to get the police and make the job of the police more difficult.
Fourth, you can't win the war against crime without bending rules; the courts have awarded criminals too many civil rights.
Fifth, the public is unsupportive and too demanding; people are quick to criticize the police unless they need help.
Taking these elements together it is easy to see how police, in their own subculture and in their own minds could justify the practice of "testilying." Simply put, the cops consider lying under oath to be either a "necessary evil to fighting crime" or "a convenient expedient" or both.
In Taiwan we have the added element of career advancement, which figured in the case of Officer Chang.
The first step to solving any problem is admitting it exists. It is time for the general public and the Taiwanese criminal justice system to face the corrosive impact of police lying and begin to remedy the situation. A cancer that is left untreated spreads.
Brian Kennedy is a member of the Board of Amnesty International Taiwan and of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS