Cross-strait relations have suffered a double-blow in the past year. First came former President Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "state-to-state" statement, followed by Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) election victory in March. Beijing's military threats then sent relations down to a new low. The Taiwan Strait came to be seen by the international community as a powder-keg.
Now, after almost two months of wary watching, Beijing officials finally seem to have some gentle words for Chen's new government -- an abrupt departure from their past attitude.
This development is more than encouraging for many in Taiwan. Even Premier Tang Fei
Chen has considerably softened his style since he took over the Presidential Office on May 20. Until now, however, Beijing's responses to Chen's goodwill gestures have been its invariable "one China." The sharp contrast between Taiwan's flexibility and Beijing's stiffness has won Taipei much sympathy internationally and made Beijing look like the troublemaker that it is.
Now, this picture might to be changing. Xiamen City Mayor Zhu Ya-yan (朱亞衍) has accepted an invitation to visit Kaohsiung City. Beijing's defense minister, Chi Haotian (遲浩田), has also told US defense secretary William Cohen that Beijing currently does not intend to attack Taiwan, even though it is not giving up its threat to use force against Taiwan either. During a meeting with Taiwan lawmakers, ARATS chairman Wang Daohan (汪道涵) said he had noticed a readjustment in Chen's pro-independence stance. Foreign minister Qian Qichen (錢其琛), head of Beijing's task force on Taiwan affairs, said talks on "direct links" do not have to include the "one China" issue. Qian even called for a quick resumption of the long-dormant Koo-Wang talks. It seems like the "one China" iceberg blocking the Strait is finally starting to melt.
We believe Taiwan should not let Beijing's unprecedented gestures of goodwill pass by. But on the other hand, we must also stay alert to a possible two-pronged strategy, using a friendly approach to divide Taiwan's internal unity. Beijing has changed its "united front"
Whether the recent goodwill gestures are a reflection of this change in strategy remains uncertain. It is possible that any surprise comments made by individual officials before the Beidaihe
Now -- the darkest time for cross-strait relations -- is also the most hopeful time for change. Indeed, there are now signs of hope that bilateral ties can be salvaged from its current quagmire.
But as Mainland Affairs Council Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen
We must warn again that a guarded optimism toward the positive interaction we are witnessing now is necessary, so we do not get carried away by wishful thinking. We have seen a tiny ray of light in the darkness, but it is still early to tell if dawn has arrived.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with