President Chen Shui-bian (
Everything seems so ridiculous and chaotic. Which era are we living in? During his inspection of cadet troops, President Chen recited words from the will of Sun Yat-sen (孫中山), "the founding father of our nation." Every time the words "the late President Chiang Kai-shek" are mentioned, the inspected troops immediately and ritualistically stand at attention to pay tribute to Chiang. How much longer will Chiang continue to be exalted as a "great" person?
Immediately standing at attention upon hearing Chiang's name is a practice invented by Zhang Zhizhong (
Another equally ridiculous scene takes place in the conference rooms of the many military, government and educational institutions. The portrait of Sun Yat-sen hangs on the front wall of the conference room. On the back wall is President Chen's portrait, while the portraits of the two Chiangs, father and son, hang on other two walls. How "great" are the Chiangs? How much longer will their portraits remain where there?
We do not intend dig into Chiang Kai-shek's past, and do not intend to "forever have his company" (長相左右), a dying wish suggested by Chiang in his will. More than 20 years ago, then-Provincial Governor Hsieh Tung-min (謝東閔) led 21 county commissioners and city mayors to kneel down and touch the ground with their foreheads in front of the sarcophagus during Chiang's funeral. The Executive Yuan ordered all civil servants and school staffs to bear mourning signs for Chiang -- a despotic act reminiscent of fascism. It is now the year 2000, and the people of Taiwan still can't rid of Chiang. How pathetic.
At the first inter-ministry meeting of the new government, Interior Minister Chang Po-ya (
What Chang pointed out is simply common sense; however, in Taiwan many common-sense statements are taboo. Things are not as simple as they appear.
If Chang's words had came from President Chen, the pro-unification media and scholars would have blasted him with abstruse political philosophies and views of history inspired by nationalism. No one can predict how far the political uproar would have lasted.
Minister Chang, though gentle in character, is firm of purpose. In addition, nobody can find fault with her ideological stance. Many major problems that run counter to common sense can be brought up by Chang, but not by Chen. Chang has the obligation to help Taiwan become a place in harmony with humanity. We shall thank her if she successfully achieves this.
Chen Kuang-fu is a former legislator.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with