There are opinions from every corner regarding whether or not the new government will postpone the privatization of state-owned-enterprises (SOEs). This is a great opportunity to reevaluate the privatization program.
First of all, it needs to be admitted that SOEs have had many problems in the past. Too many policy directives hampered business efficiency, as seen at Taiwan Motor Transport
Moreover, the lack of an evaluation system to analyze efficiency also gave management "power without responsibility." There have been numerous examples of companies operating at a loss while their managers continued to get promotions.
But is it necessary to put these enterprises into the hands of private capitalists to solve these problems?
However, the policy of privatizing 42 SOEs within five years -- an idea proposed by the KMT government at the 1996 National Development Conference -- is simply ridiculous. A total of NT$4.1 trillion would be needed for such a sale. National Sun Yat-sen University's Management Studies Center has warned that privatization efforts need to be careful about squeezing market capacity and capital.
As expected, this rash privatization policy will not be completed on schedule. The reality is very clear: business performance does not depend on ownership. Private companies lose money and go bankrupt all the time.
The problem with SOEs lies mainly in the fact that many of their managers are shackled by the layers of laws and regulations that limit their competitiveness. Internally, SOEs lack business management systems that strike a balance between and power and responsibility, and thus encourage creativity. Rarely do SOEs produce professional managers.
Given the above, eliminating SOEs should not be the only solution. The government has the power to change the existing laws and mechanisms. Why don't we take a more active approach in tackling the issue?
Look at Singapore. SingTel started selling its stock in 1992. Now, eight years later, only 12 percent of the shares have been released. The point is that SingTel was not shackled by layers of laws and regulations and as a result took off from its very first sale of shares.
We hope we won't see the new government again treading the path of limitless privatization. Perhaps a more practical way will be to return to President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) election promise to "review the privatization policies and set up a transcendent supervisory committee."
However, we would still like to remind the government of the following points:
First, the planning and evaluation of the privatization process should not be left to different government agencies. Recently, problems at SOEs under the Ministry of Economic Affairs have come under the spotlight, while the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and the Ministry of Finance have been busy privatizing their companies.
A good example is Chunghwa Telecom
Second, do not view labor unions with hostility; instead include them in the consulta-tions. The hundreds of thousands of employees of SOEs rightfully feel insecure when they see the working rights of dockyard workers going nowhere at Taiwan Machinery Manufacturing and the workers without a place to air their grievances.
More important is building reform efforts on grassroots opinion. Given the hard work done by the unions at Chinese Petroleum (中油), Chung-hwa Telecom and Aerospace Industrial Development
Finally, an evaluation mechanism must be set up to gauge the efficiency of SOEs. In a recent book titled New Government Movement
The key is to set up a mechanism to ensure a balance between power and responsibility and to evaluate the efficiency of SOEs. The evaluation should include efficient use of capital and manpower, profitability and public acceptance. Managers who perform well should be allowed to stay, while those who do badly should be asked to leave. This will not only help the corporatization of SOEs, but will also boost the morale of grassroots employees.
Chiu Yu-bin is executive secretary of the Taiwan Federation of Trade Unions.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with