Even though the US is a typical example of bipartisan politics (other parties -- such as the Reform Party -- have no significant influence), US presidents often make personnel appointments across party lines. Bill Clinton's current Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, and former presidential advisor David Gergen are both die-hard Republicans. Even Clinton's much-trusted chief of staff Leon Panetta was once a Republican.
However, putting people from different parties in one government inevitably results in barriers, due to a lack of comradeship and shared struggles. Hence, a genuine meeting of minds is difficult, as is mutual frankness.
Take Gergen for example. He served under three Republican presidents -- Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, writing speeches for them and helping package their public images. We can say he was a core element in the Republican Party. His staunch loyalty was also beyond question.
Logically, a person like him should not want to touch the Democrats with a 10-foot pole. However, after Bill Clinton took over, a bunch of kindergarten-kid-like outsiders almost turned the White House into a mad house. They also brought White House-media relations to a low ebb. Hence, Gergen was recommended to Clinton as a seasoned White House official who could get him through the crisis.
However, Gergen's appointment caused an uproar among Clinton confidantes. They could not boycott Gergen's appointment, but their working relationships with him were never harmonious. When an anonymous White House official was quoted in the media during the Whitewater scandal, Clinton's confidants even accused Gergen of being the White House "deep throat."
Having served under three presidents, Gergen must possess a refined sense of political acumen, but his first cooperative attempt with non-party colleagues was an obvious failure. He was not able to get into back into the core of power in the White House.
Finally, he bade farewell to the Clinton White House and became editor in chief of US News and World Report, resuming his original Republican persona.
Many factors caused Gergen's failure. Chief among them was the fact that he was always viewed by Clinton confidantes and top Democratic leaders as an outsider. They never saw him as one of their own. Wherever possible, he was omitted from administrative procedures and sidelined from policy-making.
The 15 KMT members in Premier-designate Tang Fei's
However, their plight is likely to be much tougher than Gergen's. Before them is the DPP party charter; behind them is KMT party discipline. Trapped between these two haycutters, their heads may roll at any moment.
More importantly, if the DPP views them as outsiders from the outset, threatening them with dismissal at every turn, how can they not feel terrible? How can they not end up like Gergen, joining the Cabinet with much pomp but leaving it as a failure? Why even bother?
Chen Shui-bian's
How to avoid this outcome? Everything depends on the magnanimity and wisdom of the DPP -- especially Chen and party chairman Li Yi-hsiung
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with