After the presidential election, subtle oscillations of temperature have occurred in cross-strait relations. Chen Shui-bian
Despite Chen's repeated public statements that he will readjust the "no haste, be patient" policy after he takes power, there are many indications that he will in fact continue to uphold policies of the Lee Teng-hui
Meanwhile, Beijing has indicated that it will set limits on Taiwanese businesses which support Taiwan independence. It will not allow them to support local Taiwanese powers back home and make economic profits in China at the same time. Beijing even believes that Taiwan's massive trade surplus with China has provided Taipei with the foreign currency to buy advanced weapons and boost pro-independence forces.
China's stance on the "three links" issue has also undergone a conspicuous change. In the past, China has tried hard to promote direct links. It has tried to promote unification through the economic unification brought about by direct links. However, now it is willing to negotiate the "three links" issue with Taiwan only under the "one China" premise.
Obviously, the economic logic of cross-strait trade has been replaced by political logic. By nature, economic exchanges are mutually beneficial. Replacing economic logic with political logic will only hurt both sides. We can now imagine the results of the "three links" issue being politicized.
For Taiwan, if it still limits trade exchanges with China after both sides have entered the WTO, then China will certainly file a charge that Taiwan is violating the supreme spirit of the WTO, which calls for open markets and free trade. A vast majority of WTO members have diplomatic relations with China. Under these circumstances, the possibility of Taiwan losing such a dispute is high. And if it did lose, it is uncertain whether Taiwan would have another chance of resolving trade disputes with China through dialogue.
Since Taiwan will enter the WTO as a "customs area" rather than a sovereign state, will it be hurt by engaging in "member to member" negotiations with China -- inadvertently highlighting in the international arena, that Taiwan is not a sovereign entity?
If Beijing insists on "one China" as a premise for "three links" and if Taiwan is not willing to give in, then the most probable outcome is "no three links and no one China." This runs counter to China's goal of using direct links to push for unification.
Because both sides have weighed down "three links" negotiations with such a heavy political baggage, this simple economic issue is now fraught with bizarre politicking. The results will only be counter-productive if Taiwan tries to use the "three links" negotiations to highlight its sovereignty, or if China tries to use the negotiations to ascertain its "one China" principle.
If both sides can view the "three links" negotiations through an economic rather than a political logic, then both may achieve what they need. A little more economic-oriented thinking and a little less political ambitions is what leaders on both sides should consider while handling the "three links" issue.
Hwang Jyh-dean is an associate professor in the international business department at National Taiwan University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with