The Pinnan industrial project, which was hastily passed at the end of last year, had its last review meeting on April 26. However, the many disputes over environmental issues surrounding the project have led to a "reprimand" issued by the Control Yuan and the committee's decision to postpone a final ruling.
The project involves a number of issues, including the threat to the ecology of the Chiku lagoon and the endangered black-faced spoonbill, massive CO2 emissions, accelerated erosion of the coastline and sand dunes and the crowding out of water resources for agricultural and residential use. Also, the location of the project site is in conflict with the rich fishing and tourism resources of Tainan County. These may have a negative impact of the future development of the Tainan Science-based Industrial Park.
According to the Environmental Protection Administration's (EPA,
Three of the 10 major issues in the EIA review, namely "alternative sites," "industrial port alternatives," and "conservation of the black-faced spoonbills" have been consistently ignored in previous review meetings.
Now that the KMT has left the final decision on the project to the new government, we call on the EPA to require the developers to meet the following demands:
1. Apart from a strict review of additional information on the conclusions reached by the 66th review meeting, the EPA should also require developers to provide additional information on and detailed evaluations of "alternative sites," "industrial port alternatives," and "conservation of the black-faced spoonbills."
2. The EPA should also require the project to undergo a "Policy Environmental Impact Assessment" in order to demonstrate the legitimacy of EIA laws and the credibility of the EIA system.
3. The industrial harbor should also be put into the scope of the Pinnan project's EIA. It would be irresponsible for the outgoing government to pass the project and leave the industrial harbor hanging in the air.
4. The EPA should also set a clear figure for the maximum area in the Chiku lagoon the project is allowed to use. The EPA should not use cloudy language that leaves people second-guessing -- such as "... a maximum 5 percent of the lagoon area; use of the rest of the lagoon is not allowed for the time being" -- then call such language an epitome of environmental protection.
5. The members of the EIA review committee should stand up courageously and strictly scrutinize the project. Otherwise, this project may possibly cause an irreversible impact on the the Chiku wetlands' ecology as well as future related problems.
6. The EPA should require developers to submit a written commitment to take full responsibility of the risks to the ecology posed by the project as well as the lives and properties of residents in and around the area. Also, land for the project should only be leased, not sold outright, so that developers cannot play fast and loose on land speculation in the name of industrial development.
We are closely watching whether the Pinnan project will become an important landmark and touchstone for Taiwan's determination to move toward sustainable development in the 21st century.
Sue Lin is a professor in the department of environment engineering at National Cheng Kung University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with