The fallout of the presidential election demonstrates a strange phenomenon. It's as if President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has been pressed to the bottom of a water tank and nearly choked. However, others have ridden the rising water caused by Lee's sinking weight.
Everyone except Lee is joyful. Even Vice President Lien Chan (連戰) who lost the election still has the support of young KMT officials and has taken over the chairmanship.
Despite his defeat, James Soong's (宋楚瑜) political power seems to be growing, nor have the core figures in the Soong camp been saddened by his defeat, because it seems that they are getting closer to power. Former Legislative Yuan speaker Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩), embroiled in a financial scandal, was restless before the election because he was worried he might go to jail if Soong lost. Now, Liu does not have to worry about being jailed: He is the convener of the preparatory committee for Soong's new party. Liu may well lead the party's legislators.
During the election, the anti-corruption voice was encouraged by Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (
Now, "black gold" elements are fighting back.
The New Taiwan Political Alliance (
Taichung County Council Speaker CB Yen (顏清標), known for his gangster reputation, attended a meeting to discuss the Alliance's future. When Lee saw Yen beside Soong at election rallies, he voiced calls against "black gold." As a result, the legislators in Yen's favor may oppose Lee's appointment as premier.
The KMT is half-collapsed, but its corruption remains intact. Soong once claimed that it was the high-level KMT officials -- not the local ones -- that should take the blame for "black gold" politics. Soong's appeasement of black gold elements may help him absorb their support and attract the pro-unification New Party and some old bureaucrats to his camp.
The KMT's split has resulted in the defeat of Lien and Soong. Both of them are talking about reform. But the fact is that those who are talking most about reform are the ones who need reforming the most. For the Taiwanese, the KMT's anti-democratic ways fave nothing to do with eliminating "black gold."
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS