The fallout of the presidential election demonstrates a strange phenomenon. It's as if President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has been pressed to the bottom of a water tank and nearly choked. However, others have ridden the rising water caused by Lee's sinking weight.
Everyone except Lee is joyful. Even Vice President Lien Chan (連戰) who lost the election still has the support of young KMT officials and has taken over the chairmanship.
Despite his defeat, James Soong's (宋楚瑜) political power seems to be growing, nor have the core figures in the Soong camp been saddened by his defeat, because it seems that they are getting closer to power. Former Legislative Yuan speaker Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩), embroiled in a financial scandal, was restless before the election because he was worried he might go to jail if Soong lost. Now, Liu does not have to worry about being jailed: He is the convener of the preparatory committee for Soong's new party. Liu may well lead the party's legislators.
During the election, the anti-corruption voice was encouraged by Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (
Now, "black gold" elements are fighting back.
The New Taiwan Political Alliance (
Taichung County Council Speaker CB Yen (顏清標), known for his gangster reputation, attended a meeting to discuss the Alliance's future. When Lee saw Yen beside Soong at election rallies, he voiced calls against "black gold." As a result, the legislators in Yen's favor may oppose Lee's appointment as premier.
The KMT is half-collapsed, but its corruption remains intact. Soong once claimed that it was the high-level KMT officials -- not the local ones -- that should take the blame for "black gold" politics. Soong's appeasement of black gold elements may help him absorb their support and attract the pro-unification New Party and some old bureaucrats to his camp.
The KMT's split has resulted in the defeat of Lien and Soong. Both of them are talking about reform. But the fact is that those who are talking most about reform are the ones who need reforming the most. For the Taiwanese, the KMT's anti-democratic ways fave nothing to do with eliminating "black gold."
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic