The fallout of the presidential election demonstrates a strange phenomenon. It's as if President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has been pressed to the bottom of a water tank and nearly choked. However, others have ridden the rising water caused by Lee's sinking weight.
Everyone except Lee is joyful. Even Vice President Lien Chan (連戰) who lost the election still has the support of young KMT officials and has taken over the chairmanship.
Despite his defeat, James Soong's (宋楚瑜) political power seems to be growing, nor have the core figures in the Soong camp been saddened by his defeat, because it seems that they are getting closer to power. Former Legislative Yuan speaker Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩), embroiled in a financial scandal, was restless before the election because he was worried he might go to jail if Soong lost. Now, Liu does not have to worry about being jailed: He is the convener of the preparatory committee for Soong's new party. Liu may well lead the party's legislators.
During the election, the anti-corruption voice was encouraged by Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (
Now, "black gold" elements are fighting back.
The New Taiwan Political Alliance (
Taichung County Council Speaker CB Yen (顏清標), known for his gangster reputation, attended a meeting to discuss the Alliance's future. When Lee saw Yen beside Soong at election rallies, he voiced calls against "black gold." As a result, the legislators in Yen's favor may oppose Lee's appointment as premier.
The KMT is half-collapsed, but its corruption remains intact. Soong once claimed that it was the high-level KMT officials -- not the local ones -- that should take the blame for "black gold" politics. Soong's appeasement of black gold elements may help him absorb their support and attract the pro-unification New Party and some old bureaucrats to his camp.
The KMT's split has resulted in the defeat of Lien and Soong. Both of them are talking about reform. But the fact is that those who are talking most about reform are the ones who need reforming the most. For the Taiwanese, the KMT's anti-democratic ways fave nothing to do with eliminating "black gold."
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030