Vice President Lien Chan (
In the US, indeed in most of the Western democracies, offering tax cuts is a sure-fire popularity move, and conversely raising taxes is a political kiss of death. Ever since Keynesian economics gained currency a half century ago, governments throughout the industrialized world have eagerly tried to use fiscal policy to flatten out the business cycle. Unfortunately, the deficits they incurred "temporarily" to stimulate the economy out of recessions proved to be politically difficult to reduce in normal times. Instead they kept growing, as each round of elections spurred parties and candidates to offer new or expanded goodies, more often than not to the middle class. Moreover, as we now know, these chronic deficits have deleterious effects, stunting economic growth and increasing unemployment. Today, nearly all OECD countries have identified deficit reduction as a top economic priority, but the political resistance remains stiff.
It would be galling if Taiwan had to repeat the same mistakes in order to learn these lessons. Unfortunately, it appears even the KMT, which used to wear responsible macroeconomic management as a badge of honor (after its debacle in China), has gone down the Santa Claus path. With this year's campaign breaking all records for expensive promises, one wonders whether the trend can be reversed.
There was a time when revenue and expenditure functioned according to an implicit understanding between Taiwan's government and its people: they weren't taxed much and got very little. Democracy changed that, with the realization that voters had to be kept happy with new spending on infrastructure and social welfare. This year, the unavoidable additional fiscal burden of earthquake reconstruction has accelerated the trend.
In this context, the consensus of many academic economists and responsible government officials is that tax increases should be an essential component of the next budget, no matter who wins the presidency.
The income tax cut Lien proposes is intended to be bundled with a hike in the valued-added tax and expansion of the tax base to offset loss in revenue. He is not therefore promising something for nothing. But we worry that an increase in tax on consumption would disproportionately affect lower and middle class wage earners who after all have to spend a greater part of their disposable income on daily necessities than do the wealthy. We would prefer to say any reform of the tax code begin with closing the egregious loopholes in the tax system that result in the magical ability of some of the island's largest corporations to avoid tax almost completely.
Now that Lien has put tax cuts on the election agenda, we can only hope that we do not see a "bidding war" between the candidates for who can offer the most generous package. We hope that the voters of Taiwan will retain their cool heads and continue to vote for responsible fiscal management.
The recurring deficits of recent years have been largely tolerated to date, since they have been identified as a by-product of a more competitive political environment. However, it is none too soon for responsible politicians to stand up and nip this trend in the bud, before it does lasting damage to our economy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with