Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) are determined to visit China. This is the KMT's attempt to reassert control over Taiwan, this time with aid from Beijing.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has denounced this collusion with China and the selling out of the Taiwanese people. This was basically a declaration of war, calling for the people to close ranks against Lien and Soong.
So why should they, as politicians, fly in the face of opinion?
Looked at in the context of Taiwan's history, it is not so difficult to understand. Taiwan has resolved the "historical problem" created by the Chiang family's 50 years of militaristic rule through the exercise of democracy. They have used democracy to counter authoritarianism, and through numerous elections have reduced the KMT's grip on power.
The first step is to declare war on an "alien regime," the second is to break up the political parties that represent it and third, establish Taiwan as an independent entity. This is a long road to travel, and it must be walked one step at a time. The results of the last two presidential elections show that the people's efforts have not been wasted.
The descendants of Chiang family rule -- namely Soong and Lien -- know they have little chance of re-establishing the power of their alien political regime. Their only choice is to sell themselves to China. At its most serious, this is an attempt to use China's power to control Taiwan. At a more egotistical level, they are joining with China to enhance their own political fortunes.
The Chiang family saw Taiwan as a springboard for retaking China. But under the creative shift in direction orchestrated by the KMT and PFP, the springboard now operates in the other direction. By joining with China, the pan-blue camp can throw a spanner in the works of Taiwan's democratization, revenge the destruction of their party and their aspirations. A pilgrimage to China will also diminish Taiwan, thereby diminishing its government. As for the people of Taiwan, as far as the pan-blue camp is concerned, they can go to hell.
The treasonous behavior of Lien and Soong will force the people of Taiwan to take sides. Lee's demand is that we resist the forces that favor China over Taiwan. If Lien and Soong take the bait that China offers, Taiwan will face a clear and present danger. How can the people of Taiwan stand by and do nothing?
Lien and Soong may think they have a done deal, but do they not see that public opinion is arming itself against them? The people will not tolerate China reaching into our backyard, nor will they tolerate an "alien regime" allying with China.
With China's "Anti-Secession" Law and local politicians "joining with China to control Taiwan," what options do the people have? The time has come "to resist the invader and root out traitors."
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS