So Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), long an admired official of the Republic of China government, who played an admirable role in Taiwan's democratization, but who very narrowly lost the last presidential election, now plans to visit Beijing. There he will evidently find plenty of time for amiable discussions with the unelected leader of one of the world's last communist dictatorships.
In preparation for this trip, moreover, Lien has found time for a secret visit to Singapore where he found time for consultation with its autocratic rulers. But Lien has been unable to find time for what is really needed: namely, a face-to-face discussion with the elected president and government of his own country, the Republic of China, and wide discussion among the people of Taiwan, to ensure that at this critical juncture politics really do end at the water's edge, and Taiwan speaks with a single voice. Few things are more important to the nation's future than a certain basic domestic consensus.
By making this trip, Lien also jeopardizes the political future of a whole younger generation of highly talented KMT politicians, poised to take the reins of government once again, probably sooner rather than later. Now they will be tarred by this ill-judged venture.
But above all, Lien puts at risk his own historical reputation. For even though Beijing is promising Lien a welcome with protocol normally reserved for heads of state, neither Lien nor anyone else should have the slightest doubt as to how Chinese communist leadership in fact sees his mission: Zheng Chenggong's (鄭成功) grandson, long expected in Beijing, has finally arrived.
That grandson, Zheng Keshuang (鄭克塽), is remembered as the man who abandoned the Ming cause and turned Taiwan over to the Qing in 1683 in return for the empty title and honors of "Duke."
If Lien cannot find the wisdom to call off this ill-judged venture, let us hope at least that he will consult broadly in Taiwan before he leaves, not least with its elected government, and that in China he will have the courage to speak truth to power, robustly defending the rights of the people of Taiwan and the great democratic tradition of Sun Yat-sen (孫中山) , of which his party is the custodian. Otherwise, I fear Lien will end in humiliation what has been a long and distinguished career.
Arthur Waldron
Professor of international relations, University of Pennsylvania
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS