When US President George W. Bush is inaugurated for his second term today, up to 200 central city blocks will be restricted or closed completely to vehicles -- and at least 3,000 police officers will be imported from other jurisdictions.
The event will be highest security inauguration in the country's 229-year history, the first installation of a president since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Bush himself believes the inauguration is "an attractive target for terrorists," he recently told the Washington Post.
People who work near the White House and the parade route have been told which building doors they may enter, and what they may carry. Some streets will have been closed for days before today, and some metro stations will be closed today.
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge has conceded that the government knows of no credible terrorist threats to the inauguration.
A more likely issue could be protestors along the parade route on Pennsylvania Avenue from the landmark Capital building, with its rotunda, where Bush will be sworn in at noon, to the White House. At Bush's first installation, his caravan was pummelled with eggs.
The DC Anti-War Network hopes to spark civil disobedience and will rally in an outlying park and march downtown, where they plan to lie down in the roads. But with all the streets closed to cars, it's not clear who would notice such an obstruction.
Another group, Anarchist Resistance, used its Web site to announce a march and decried the inauguration as "one of the grandest ceremonies of the ruling class."
"Let's bring anarchy to the streets of DC -- make resistance visible, and ring in the next four years with a smash!" the group urges.
A few conservative groups plan rallies to support Bush.
Pennsylvania Avenue was closed at 6pm yesterday as city workers removed streetlights and welded shut manholes. In all, Washington will see traffic limited on a swath of the city more than seven blocks wide and 21 blocks long.
Unprecedented numbers of army canine handlers with explosive- sniffing dogs will be on duty. Horse-mounted US Park Police and military infantry with assault rifles and night-vision goggles will guard against attack. Marines trained to respond to biological and chemical attacks and military engineers trained in collapsed-building rescues will be on standby for a worst-case scenario.
"We all take great pride in not only being prepared for but also several steps ahead of any possible emergency or threat," said Ralph Basham, director of the Secret Service, which protects the president and other dignitaries.
Federal workers across the capital region will get today off as a holiday, estimated to cost US$66 million in lost work time.
Some employees were even supposed to get yesterday afternoon off, in the inner top security region.
Washington Mayor Anthony Williams is upset that the city must foot more than US$17 million, mostly for security, which it says drains resources for crimefighting. Ironically, the city's constituents cannot even vote in national elections due to the capital city's unique status, yet their taxes pay for many of Washington's special needs.
The city has sought extra money from Congress, but Bush administration officials say the city gets about US$80 million a year in extra federal money since Sept. 11 to defray the capital's unique security requirements.
Government agencies have spent more than a year developing security plans, regardless of election outcome. The inauguration is a national event, not just a party for the political victors.
Ridge, vowed last week that "local, state and federal government are as prepared as possible to thwart any attempts at disruption of this celebration of democracy, to thwart terrorists and to protect the hallmark of our democratic and constitutional traditions."
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the