China's rhetoric about Taiwan has sharpened a fair bit. The re-election of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has jolted its leadership. It's not that Chen has said anything to upset China (indeed, his inaugural address was rather tame), but because China's leadership believes that his moderation is not real. He is still committed to an independent and sovereign Taiwan, as Beijing sees it.
According to Wu Nengyuan (
The question then is: Has Chen done that? Apparently not. What then is making Beijing up the ante? There are a number of explanations.
First, it could have something to do with an ongoing power struggle between President Hu Jintao (
Another reason is a sense of overwhelming frustration. Bei-jing was hoping to create a substantial pro-China constituency within Taiwan. That hasn't happened. Indeed, Chen polled more votes in this year's election than in 2000. And among his political opponents, most hedged or opposed unification with China. As Wu has said, "There's no longer any politician in Taiwan they can rely on for unification because there's no one that stands for unification."
The sense of frustration is further compounded because Beijing is unable to effectively use its new leverage with the US (from Iraq and North Korea) on Taiwan. Bei-jing was obviously encouraged by US President George W. Bush's gentle rebuke, some months ago, cautioning Chen against changing the status quo. But since then the US has maintained its old position of encouraging dialogue across the Taiwan Strait.
During her recent China visit, US National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice came under intense pressure on Taiwan. She reportedly rebuffed Chinese demands to curb arms sales to Taiwan. Ever since Sino-US relations were resumed in the 1970s, Beijing has sought to use its US connection to facilitate the unification of Taiwan with China. The curbing of US arms sales would be an important step in that direction.
A recent news conference in Washington called by a Chinese embassy spokesman would suggest a new (rather unusual) effort to highlight the Taiwan issue in the Sino-US equation. According to the embassy spokesman, US actions on Taiwan had undermined the "one China" policy underpinning US-China relations. A failure to rectify the situation would harm bilateral relations, including Chinese cooperation on North Korea's nuclear policy.
According to The Washington Post, Rice was told when in China that Beijing would "not sit idly by" if arms sales to Taiwan went ahead. Taiwan is thus said to be "an obstacle" to US-China relations. Indeed, according to the Post report, "Chinese officials appear to believe the [Bush] administration's policies on human rights, democracy and Hong Kong `added up to a policy aimed at regime change in Beijing.'"
In other words, China's communist leadership is becoming even more paranoid than usual. But there is a method to their madness. Their renewed political offensive is part of their push to become and be regarded as the world's second superpower. To achieve this they badly need US acknowledgement. Not only that, they even seek US facilitation to make it happen.
There is a sense in China that the world somehow owes it the restoration of its old glory as the Middle Kingdom. But instead of helping this global project, the US is seen as impeding it by encouraging the "renegade" province of Taiwan from staying apart. Communist China, therefore, suffers from the self-righteous anger of not being accorded its supposedly rightful central place in the global hierarchy. Such frustration occasionally finds expression in a mighty display of military power (just short of using it) against the small nation of Taiwan.
Under the circumstances, any Chinese invasion of Taiwan would not only require utmost secrecy to surprise and overwhelm the enemy, but also execution in the shortest possible time. But Beijing is going all over town to announce that it "will absolutely not tolerate Taiwan's independence." Which, in any case, is not the issue currently because Chen is not pushing the independence agenda.
As Chen said in his inaugural speech, "[Taiwan and China] must work together to guarantee that there will be no unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait."
Therefore, Beijing's constant refrain that it doesn't trust Chen is a red herring, being used to put maximum pressure on the US at a time when it is over-stretched. Its timing is also important in the context of the US presidential election. Beijing is testing the political waters in Washington. The US establishment across the political spectrum is being told loudly that Taiwan is an obstacle to the development of US-Chinese relations and needs sorting out. If not, China might see fit to withdraw its cooperation on North Korea and elsewhere.
As for the specifics of the Taiwan situation, China would like Washington to start with curbing its arms sales to Taiwan. Will the US fall for it? It seems unlikely, considering it has always resisted giving China a blank check to annex Taiwan. Washington will continue to favor peaceful dialogue across the Taiwan Strait, as Rice told the Beijing authorities during her recent China visit.
Sushil Seth is a freelance writer based in Sydney.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS