In the strange case of Sergeant Charles Robert Jenkins, four seemingly obscure people have been caught up in diplomatic maneuvering among the US, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, China and Indonesia.
The issue: the US Army wants to arrest Jenkins on charges of desertion and aiding the enemy -- among the most serious of military crimes -- to keep faith with the hundreds of thousands of American men and women who have served honorably over the past 40 years and to preserve good order and discipline.
In contrast, the Japanese government and a wide segment of the Japanese public want to see an aging and ailing Jenkins reunited permanently with his wife, a Japanese citizen, and their two daughters, and allowed to live out his life peacefully.
Jenkins's nieces and nephews in North Carolina, who have heard little from him for 40 years, assert on the Internet (www.charlesrobert jen-kins.org) that Jenkins is a prisoner of war who has been abandoned.
"We believe that the US Army deserted my uncle," says an entry on the Web site.
And, from all appearances, North Korea, South Korea, China and Indonesia want the issue quietly to go away and not interfere with larger issues, notably negotiations intended to defuse North Korea's aspirations to acquire nuclear arms.
This convoluted tale begins in South Korea in 1965 when Jenkins disappeared while on a patrol in the demilitarized zone between South and North Korea. Shortly after, he turned up in Pyongyang.
In 1978, North Korean agents kidnapped Hitomi Soga and her mother near their home in Japan and took her to Pyongyang. There Soga, now 45, met Jenkins and married him in 1980. They produced two daughters.
Not much was heard from them until Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited North Korea in 2002 and brought back Soga and four other kidnapped Japanese. Since then, Soga has been pleading with Japan, the US and North Korea to allow her husband and daughters to join her.
The family was reunited in Jakarta on July 9.
The question is whether the US will take custody of Jenkins under the Status of Forces Agreement, which sets the conditions under which US troops are stationed in Japan. It applies to Jenkins because desertion has no statute of limitations and he is considered to be still under military jurisdiction.
Besides desertion and aiding the enemy, both of which could be punished by death, Jenkins has been charged with urging two other soldiers to desert and with two instances of encouraging disloyalty.
Jenkins's family in North Carolina have asked that the charges be dropped. In a letter to US President George W. Bush, Susan Cutting, a niece, wrote: "It is very hard to believe in our system of government when men like [former US president] Richard Nixon get pardoned for their crimes and men like [former US president] Bill Clinton commit perjury and do not get [removed from office].
"Vietnam War deserters and draft dodgers got pardons and I believe my uncle should also," Cutting said.
"He is an old man; much older from the pictures than his 62 years. If, in fact, he is a deserter and defector, I believe he has paid enough for his crimes," she said.
After Bush met Koizumi in Georgia last month, an administration official said the president expressed "an understanding of why the Japanese public and why the prime minister want to do everything they can to help find a humanitarian answer to this real puzzle." Bush also noted that the charges against Jenkins are serious.
Supporters of Jenkins have urged that he be given the chance to tell his story. The best place to hear that would be a court martial, with its demands for evidence and the right to cross-examination. Jenkins would be considered innocent until proven guilty and the burden of proof would be on the government.
Knowledgeable military officers have suggested that Jenkins could be offered an administrative hearing before a senior officer that could end in something like a dishonorable discharge but no jail time.
Army authorities also want to question Jenkins about other Americans thought to be deserters in North Korea and to glean intelligence from him.
What other American has spent the last 40 years in North Korea?
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS