China's promise that Hong Kong will remain unchanged for 50 years under the policy of "one country, two systems" has lasted for less than seven years. On the seventh anniversary of Hong Kong's handover to China, democratic groups are scheduled to launch a large-scale demonstration today, demanding that Beijing keep its promises of direct elections of the chief executive and the Legislative Council in Hong Kong. It's estimated that more than 300,000 people will take part in the protest.
Last year over 500,000 protesters took to Hong Kong's streets on this date to denounce the legislation based on Article 23 of the Basic Law. The action focused the attention of the world on the erosion of Hong Kong's freedoms and the delay in giving it accountable democratic government.
The government's legislation of a controversial anti-subversion law, which could have easily been used to cook up charges of treason against democracy activists, was frustrated as a result of the demonstration. But less than a year later, on April 26, China's National People's Congress dashed Hong Kong people's hopes to directly elect their leader and lawmakers by 2007 and 2008, respectively, basically trying to delay the democratic development of Hong Kong forever.
Economically, Hong Kong prospered mightily under British colonial rule. Although it suffered from the global economic downturn and the outbreak of SARS last year, its economy is recovering as the global economy grows this year. The Hang Seng Bank also revised its forecasts on Hong Kong's GDP growth for this year to 6 percent from 5.5 percent yesterday. Still, the halo surrounding Hong Kong's economy has faded. The exotic cultural crossroads atmosphere of Hong Kong's society has been replaced by Sinification. Hong Kong has lost its charm to become another drab Chinese city. If this was the intention of Hong Kong's nationalists, we can only congratulate them on their stunning success.
Hong Kong and Taiwan have both been deeply influenced by ideas of free trade, and over the last 50 years have also remained open to Western cultural influences and are therefore international in outlook. We must give our spiritual support to Hong Kong's demonstrators. Democracy has never been a gift from heaven and has always been paid for in the blood and sweat of the people.
On this anniversary of Hong Kong's handover to China, the oppressive rule they have endured over this period undermines the legitimacy of Beijing's insistence on the "one China" principle. Hong Kong's example reinforces the commitment of Taiwan to democracy, and the belief that the achievement must be protected. Taiwanese can see quite clearly the bleak result of putting faith in China's promises, which have been shown to be no more substantial than the clouds.
China has constantly sought to disparage Taiwan's democratic achievements, emphasizing that democratic politics are merely another way of gaining power, the aim of which is to declare independence. It has used this as a stick with which to beat Hong Kong's pro-democracy activists. But democracy is a universal value and Taiwan's democratic reforms are only a small part of a great international current flowing in this direction. Alone our strength might be insignificant, but we call on people all round the world to lend their voices in support of the people of Hong Kong in their action to achieve democracy.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS