Achieving a free-trade pact with the US was supposed to be the magic moment that certified Chile's entry into the elite club of stable, democratic and prosperous nations. Instead, the new accord, signed in January, has reignited a sometimes anguished debate here about what it means to be Latin American and whether Chile has lost those essential characteristics.
Since the beginning of the decade, all three of Chile's neighbors have suffered political and economic convulsions that have forced changes of government. In sharp contrast to Argentina, Bolivia and Peru, not to mention the rest of South America, Chile these days looks "dull but virtuous," to borrow the title of a recent report by one Wall Street brokerage house.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
This is a country where most people actually pay their taxes, laws are rigidly enforced and the police only rarely seek bribes. That is unusual for Latin America and probably should be cause for celebration. Yet, it has the rest of the region looking at Chile as if there is something wrong with it because it is not what the Brazilians call "bagunca" or what the Argentines call "quilombo" -- passionately messy, turbulent and chaotic.
"The image of Chile for many years has been that of a country that is `different' and solitary," the Peruvian political commentator Alvaro Vargas Llosa, wrote in a recent essay that generated much comment here.
"Curiously, although Chile has undertaken a growing trade with the world and attracted investments, it was perceived as `isolated' in a space that is psychological more than political or economic," Vargas Llosa wrote.
Chileans were reminded of their unpopularity late last year, when an uprising in neighboring Bolivia overthrew a president who favored exporting natural gas through a Chilean port. Bolivia has been landlocked since losing a war to Chile in 1879, and Chileans were shocked to discover that many Latin Americans -- led by the Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez -- supported Bolivia's historical claim to recover a piece of its coastline.
It has been this way for at least a generation, Chile as South America's odd man out. When Salvador Allende came to power in 1970, the rest of the Southern Cone was ruled by right-wing military dictatorships, and by the time those countries began to swing back toward democracy in the 1980s, General Augusto Pinochet was in power.
Chileans gained sympathy during the Pinochet dictatorship, when "solidarity with Chile was a cause that people in Latin America believed in, somewhat like Spain was in the late 1930s," said the writer Ariel Dorfman. But that changed when democracy returned, he said.
"Many people resented how Chileans, especially our entrepreneurs, behaved, buying up all the banks and telephone and electricity companies and acting arrogant and obnoxious," Dorfman said.
Today, Chile is a hypercapitalist state at a time when Argentina, Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil and Uruguay are all moving leftward and questioning free trade and open markets. Chile may also be suffering from what might be called teacher's pet syndrome. Since the 1980s, other Latin American countries have had to endure repeated lectures from the US, Europe and Japan on the need to become more like Chile in opening their economies to the world and combating corruption.
"For some mysterious socio-cultural reason, we have been 'the serious kids in the neighborhood,'" Mario Waissbluth, a business consultant here, acknowledged recently in an essay for the newspaper La Tercera. "We are the nerd student who does all of his homework and is loathsome to the rest" of his classmates.
"Obviously it's better to be dull and virtuous than bloody and Pinochetista, but Chile has been a very gray country for many years now," said Dorfman, whose novel The Nanny and the Iceberg deconstructs Chile's "cool and efficient" image of itself. "Modernization doesn't necessarily have to come with soullessness, and I think there is a degree of that happening," Dorfman said.
The Free-Trade Agreement with the US has aggravated all these contradictory sentiments.
"Everyone, from Peru to Colombia, is fighting tooth and nail to get the same status," Vargas Llosa wrote. "But it pains them that Chile has got there ahead of them."
Government officials here say they are conscious of their spotty image and are moving to mend fences with their neighbors. But their initiatives have been limited mainly to trade-oriented efforts like dispatching delegations to Brazil and Central America to advise on what to expect in negotiations with the US.
"My concern is that of Chileans being seen as the new Phoenicians of Latin America, just good at trade," said Maria de los Angeles Fernandez, a political scientist at Diego Portales University here. "That is not sufficient to have good relations. You need other means of communication."
Simultaneously, though, Chile is also looking to establish alliances beyond its own troubled neighborhood. A free-trade agreement with the EU went into effect last year, a similar accord with South Korea has been ratified and in November Chile will play host to a conference of the 21-member APEC conference -- an effort to strengthen its identity as part of the equally dull but virtuous Pacific basin.
"We are trying to do everything within our reach to integrate ourselves" with the world beyond Latin America, Ricardo Lagos Weber, the main organizer of the conference and the son of the president, acknowledged in an interview.
But there is also a recognition here, he added, that Chile "can't be an enclave of modernity surrounded by poverty, instability and bad vibes" without suffering any of the consequences.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with