With little regard for Chinese customs, US President George W. Bush criticized China in a speech at a community school in Ohio State on Jan. 21, the first day of the Lunar New Year holidays. Bush reiterated the US' pursuit of free trade and demanded that the country's trade partners follow the trade principles of fairness and freedom. He singled out China, which enjoys a massive trade surplus with the US, as an example of a country pursuing unfair trade policies. The main cause of the trade imbalance, he said, was China's policy of keeping the yuan weak against the US dollar.
Bush's accusation reminds many people of a series of measures Beijing took to suppress the yuan from strengthening in the latter half of last year. After some defensive and offensive moves, the official value of the yuan remained unchanged and pegged to the US dollar, but China has also lowered export rebate rates to curb exports and maintain the yuan's value.
However, the pressure on the yuan to appreciate also remains. Many international media forecast at the end of last year that the yuan would appreciate early this year. Will Bush's comments help realize this forecast?
I believe everyone is eager to know the answer to this hotly debated issue. The so-called experts and professionals naturally will not miss this great opportunity to boost their reputation. The problem is: Is there really a standard answer? Who exactly has the power to make this decision? Why does this issue concern people so much?
As China is called the "world's factory," it is easy to understand why the yuan's value is in the international spotlight. Investors from around the world flock to China. Speculators also cast a greedy eye on the prey. China's magnetic pull on global funds offers clear proof of this issue's importance.
From the import and export of products to the inflow and outflow of hot money in speculative trading, everything is affected by the yuan's value. Any slight change results in enormous gains and losses. The yuan's fluctuation will only become an ever hotter issue as the Chinese economy grows. The likelihood of it triggering a domino effect is more than theoretical. In light of this, maintaining the stability of the yuan is reasonable. How to maintain its stability thus becomes a global issue. But is it possible to reach this goal?
Setting aside basic theories, everyone is clear that the fluctuation of the yuan is not just an economic issue, but also a political one.
Beijing tries to control the market with its "black hand" behind the scenes. This appears to be effective on the surface and in the short term. But in the end market forces will react, as is happening already.
This should be a familiar scene to those who have studied Taiwan's economic development in the 1980s. In 1986 the New Taiwan dollar rose sharply and was liberalized. Could this happen in China this year?
Wu Hui-lin is a research fellow at the Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS